FR 2025-02159

Overview

Title

Combined Notice of Filings #1

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Energy Department is looking at some requests and complaints about electricity prices and rules. They are also helping people understand how to share their thoughts about these changes.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) announced a series of filings and complaints related to electric rates and compliance for various companies. Notable mentions include a complaint by Voltus, Inc. against the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. and several submissions for changes in status by companies like Amazon Energy LLC and Basin Electric Power Cooperative. Comment dates for these filings are set for February 2025, and individuals interested in participating in these proceedings must adhere to FERC's regulations by the specified deadlines. FERC also provides support for public engagement, helping individuals navigate the process of making filings or comments.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 8935
Document #: 2025-02159
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 8935-8936

AnalysisAI

The document issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), as recorded in the Federal Register, details recent filings and complaints related to electric rates and compliance by various companies. The document lists numerous docket numbers and provides a schedule for comment deadlines in February 2025. Among the notable items is a complaint by Voltus, Inc. against the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. The document also includes various submissions from companies like Amazon Energy LLC and Basin Electric Power Cooperative, indicating a change in their status. Individuals interested in contributing to these proceedings are encouraged to adhere to FERC's regulations by specified deadlines, and the document mentions resources for the public to engage in these proceedings effectively.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The document contains an extensive array of docket numbers and filings that could potentially overwhelm or confuse those who lack familiarity with regulatory language and processes. This dense and technical nature might limit public comprehension and accessibility. Additionally, the distinction between different types of filings, such as complaints, compliance filings, and rate filings, requires further clarification for those not versed in the legal and technical terminologies employed throughout the document. The document uses terms like '§ 205(d) Rate Filing' and 'NITSA NOA' without providing clear explanations, which could hinder understanding for the general public.

Impact on the Public

The document's impact on the general public largely depends on how these filings influence electric rates and energy distribution, which can subsequently affect energy costs and availability. Although the document mentions opportunities for public intervention and participation, it falls short of explaining the direct consequences these filings could have on consumers or the broader energy market. Such information would be beneficial for those hoping to understand the implications on household energy costs or local energy infrastructure.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved, like energy companies and authors of the filings, this document delineates the necessary procedures and deadlines crucial for ensuring compliance and engagement with FERC's processes. Moreover, it may influence market competitiveness and business operations for these entities. Companies named in the filings, such as Amazon Energy LLC and Basin Electric Power Cooperative, may experience changes in their operational status that could affect their business strategies and market positions.

In particular, complaints like that from Voltus, Inc. against Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. may have significant ramifications if the Commission were to act upon them, potentially altering how energy is managed and distributed in the affected regions. Similarly, the compliance filings and status changes could shape the regulatory landscape and market dynamics for other involved parties.

Overall, while the document provides essential regulatory information for industry insiders, it would benefit from improved clarity and relevance for the general public. Enhanced transparency and more accessible language could facilitate meaningful public engagement, enabling stakeholders and everyday citizens alike to better navigate and influence energy policy and its broader impacts.

Issues

  • • The document contains a large number of docket numbers and filings that might be difficult for an ordinary reader to follow, potentially leading to confusion.

  • • The distinction between complaints, compliance filings, and rate filings is not immediately clear to those unfamiliar with regulatory language and requirements.

  • • The use of legal and technical terms such as '§ 205(d) Rate Filing' and 'NITSA NOA' without sufficient explanation may hinder comprehension for the general public.

  • • There is no clear explanation of how these filings might impact the general public, which may be necessary for informed public participation.

  • • The document mentions specific applicants and filings without any context on the nature or significance of these entities or their filings, which may lead to a lack of transparency.

  • • The process for intervention or protesting requires understanding of specific rules (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214, or 385.206), which may not be accessible to all readers.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,977
Sentences: 140
Entities: 240

Language

Nouns: 700
Verbs: 59
Adjectives: 37
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 237

Complexity

Average Token Length:
6.24
Average Sentence Length:
14.12
Token Entropy:
4.64
Readability (ARI):
17.48

Reading Time

about 7 minutes