FR 2025-01993

Overview

Title

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule To Adopt Fees for Dedicated Cross Connection Access to the Testing Systems Environment

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Miami International Securities Exchange wants to charge a new fee for a special way to connect to their practice systems, which helps people test trades before doing them for real. They told the SEC about this plan, and now the SEC is asking everyone to say what they think about it.

Summary AI

The Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC has submitted a proposed rule change to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to amend its fee schedule. The change is to introduce a new fee for market participants who want to use a direct connection to the Exchange's testing systems. This proposal was filed on January 14, 2025, and is immediately effective. The SEC is inviting comments from the public on this proposed change until February 21, 2025.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 8729
Document #: 2025-01993
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 8729-8729

AnalysisAI

In a recent filing, the Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC has proposed a rule change that seeks to amend its fee schedule. This new amendment aims to introduce a fee for direct and dedicated access to the exchange's testing systems environment through what is called a "dedicated cross connection." The proposal, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on January 14, 2025, is immediately effective, although public comments are invited until February 21, 2025.

General Summary

The document presents the proposed amendment as a simple change to the exchange's fee schedule. The amendment introduces costs for market participants seeking to establish a direct connection to the testing environment. The intention, as delineated by the Miami International Securities Exchange, is to facilitate an additional dedicated connection option for users involved in testing systems related to securities and exchange-related transactions.

Significant Issues or Concerns

Despite the clarity of the filing procedure, concerns do arise from several areas within the document:

  • Lack of Fee Specification: The document does not specify how much this new fee will cost, creating potential ambiguities for market participants. Clear financial details are crucial in ensuring transparency and equitable understanding.

  • Complex Legal Language: The document references specific sections of the Securities Exchange Act and procedural rules, which might be challenging to grasp for individuals without a legal background. Simplifying these references or providing additional explanations could aid in wider public comprehension.

  • Missing Contextual Information: Terms like "testing systems environment" and "dedicated cross connection" are used without definition. This lack of explanation could lead to confusion among individuals who are not familiar with industry jargon.

  • Absence of Justification: There is no detailed reasoning provided about why the new fee is being introduced, raising potential concerns about the fairness and transparency of the change.

Public Impact

This document has significant implications for market participants—especially those reliant on testing environments for securities trading. By imposing a fee for direct access, there could be financial implications for smaller market entities that may face challenges affording such costs. The absence of an impact analysis further compounds the potential inequity concern, as smaller players might be disproportionately affected compared to larger participants with more resources.

Stakeholder Impact

For Larger Firms: These entities might view the fee as part of regular operational costs, given their potentially larger financial resources and capacity to benefit from dedicated connections.

For Smaller Firms and New Entrants: The new fee could represent a financial barrier to accessing essential testing facilities, potentially affecting competitiveness and market entry.

For General Market Participants and Consumers: If costs for testing and compliance increase for smaller firms, this could influence the broader market dynamics. Such changes could potentially lead to reduced competition if smaller firms are pushed out or discouraged from participating.

Overall, while the proposal indicates changes meant to improve the operational standards of the Miami International Securities Exchange, it is crucial to address these potential issues to promote fairness and transparency in how such amendments are rolled out and understood by the impacted entities.

Issues

  • • The document establishes a fee for dedicated cross connection access to the testing systems environment, but it does not specify the amount of the fee, which might lead to ambiguity or misunderstanding among market participants.

  • • The language used in the legal and procedural references (e.g., references to specific sections of the Securities Exchange Act and CFR) might be difficult for a layperson to understand, suggesting a need for more accessible language or supplementary explanations.

  • • The document refers readers to multiple online sources for the full text of the proposed rule change but does not provide summarization or highlights within the document itself, which may hinder understanding for those unable to access or navigate these sources.

  • • There's no clear analysis or justification provided within the notice for the introduction of the fee, which might raise concerns about the transparency and fairness of the proposed change.

  • • The document uses terms like 'testing systems environment' and 'dedicated cross connection' without providing definitions or context, which might be unclear to individuals not familiar with specific technical or industry jargon.

  • • No impact analysis is provided on how this fee might affect smaller market participants differently compared to larger ones, which could raise concerns about equity and fair competition.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 777
Sentences: 26
Entities: 69

Language

Nouns: 238
Verbs: 64
Adjectives: 29
Adverbs: 20
Numbers: 48

Complexity

Average Token Length:
6.00
Average Sentence Length:
29.88
Token Entropy:
5.13
Readability (ARI):
25.35

Reading Time

about 3 minutes