Overview
Title
Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board; Members
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The National Archives has picked three people, William, Valorie, and Ovnelle, to help review how well some of their top bosses are doing at work. These choices are new and replace any old ones they had before.
Summary AI
The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) has announced the appointment of new members to its Performance Review Board (PRB), which evaluates the performance of senior executives. The members are William J. Bosanko, Valorie F. Findlater, and Ovnelle Millwood. This update replaces any previous appointments. The appointments are effective as of January 29, 2025.
Abstract
Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Performance Review Board (PRB). The members of the PRB for the National Archives and Records Administration are: William J. Bosanko, Deputy Archivist; Valorie F. Findlater, Chief Management and Administration; and Ovnelle Millwood, acting Chief Human Capital Officer. These appointments supersede all previous appointments.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document under review is a formal notice from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) published in the Federal Register. This notice announces the updated appointments to the Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB) within NARA. These appointments include William J. Bosanko as Deputy Archivist, Valorie F. Findlater as Chief Management and Administration, and Ovnelle Millwood as acting Chief Human Capital Officer. The appointments became effective on January 29, 2025.
General Summary
The primary purpose of this document is to inform the public about the new compositions of the SES Performance Review Board at NARA. Performance Review Boards are essential components within federal agencies, as they evaluate and make recommendations concerning the performance of senior executives. These roles are critical because they help ensure accountability and effective management within government organizations. This notice also emphasizes that these new appointments override any prior arrangements, thereby signaling a fresh setup for future reviews.
Significant Issues and Concerns
The document comes across as efficient but leaves some questions unanswered. For instance:
Lack of Transparency in the Selection Process: The announcement provides the names and positions of the new members but does not elaborate on how or why these individuals were selected. Transparency in such processes could reassure the public about the integrity and meritocracy of public service appointments.
Absence of Budget Information: There are no details mentioned regarding the budget or financial implications of these appointments. Understanding the costs involved might be valuable for assessing taxpayer funds' usage.
Reason for Superseding Previous Appointments: The document states that these new appointments replace all previous ones but does not explain why this change was necessary. Providing reasons could prevent misunderstandings and speculation about the change's nature.
Legal References and Jargon: The document cites a legal authority (5 U.S.C. 4314(c)) without explaining its specifics. For a general audience, it may be beneficial to include a brief explanation to clarify its relevance.
Public Impact
Broadly, this document signifies an administrative update that is primarily procedural. However, understanding the shift in leadership within NARA’s SES PRB can be indicative of broader policy directions or shifts within the agency. This can impact how senior management in the agency are reviewed and assessed, potentially affecting the agency's operation and efficiency.
Impact on Stakeholders
For stakeholders directly involved with or affected by NARA’s decisions, such as researchers, historians, and governmental records officers, these appointments might affect the agency's strategic directions and priorities. New leadership in review boards can lead to changes in how senior executive performance is evaluated and how related recommendations are made.
For the general public, while the direct impact may not be immediately evident, these appointments illustrate ongoing changes and operations within federal agencies, reflecting the broader mechanisms of government accountability and oversight. Such transparency is essential in maintaining public trust in governmental operations.
Overall, while the appointment notice is routine, it highlights the structures in place to maintain federal agency efficiency and offers a snapshot of the changing personnel landscape within NARA.
Issues
• The document does not specify any details about budget or spending involved in the SES Performance Review Board, which could be useful to determine if there is any wasteful spending.
• The document mentions the appointment of specific individuals to the Performance Review Board but does not provide any information on the selection process, which could be perceived as lacking transparency.
• The document specifies that the appointments supersede all previous appointments but does not explain the reason for this change, which might benefit from further explanation to prevent ambiguity.
• The reference to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c) provides legal context but may be unclear to readers unfamiliar with legal references; a brief explanation of its contents could improve understanding.
• The use of specific roles and titles without further context may not be readily understood by those outside the agency or government operations.