Overview
Title
Vanillin From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination; Correction
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The U.S. Department of Commerce made a mistake in a notice about a company from China that makes vanillin, mixing up the company's name. They've now fixed it so they can keep working on the investigation correctly.
Summary AI
The U.S. Department of Commerce announced a correction to a notice previously published about the investigation into countervailing duties on vanillin from China. The document initially named the company involved in the investigation incorrectly. The corrected company name is Jiaxing Guihua Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. This correction has been issued to ensure the investigation proceeds with the right information.
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice in the Federal Register on November 18, 2024, in which it announced the preliminary determination in the countervailing duty (CVD) investigation of vanillin from the People's Republic of China (China). In this notice, Commerce incorrectly identified the mandatory respondent in the investigation as Jiaxing Guihua Chemical Import and Export Co., Ltd. The correct name of the mandatory respondent is Jiaxing Guihua Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
This document issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce serves as a corrective notice concerning a previous announcement related to the investigation of countervailing duties on vanillin—a vanilla-flavoring compound—from China. Initially, the notice incorrectly identified a Chinese company involved in the investigation. The correction clarifies that the correct name of the company is Jiaxing Guihua Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd., ensuring the accuracy required for ongoing legal and trade procedures.
General Summary
The notice primarily serves to correct a clerical error in a prior Federal Register publication, changing the name of the company involved in the countervailing duty investigation on vanillin from a misidentified version to its correct designation. Such corrections, while minor in nature, are crucial to maintain the integrity and accuracy of official administrative records.
Significant Issues or Concerns
One significant issue highlighted by this document is the importance of accuracy in official communications. Even though the error seems administrative, such mistakes could potentially lead to misunderstandings or legal challenges if not promptly corrected. This instance underscores the necessity for meticulous attention to detail within governmental agencies, particularly when dealing with international trade matters.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the document would have a minimal direct impact. However, it underscores the meticulous procedural nature of international trade regulations. Corrections like these might not directly affect day-to-day life but are part of broader economic systems that can influence trade balances, pricing of goods, and, indirectly, their availability to consumers.
Impact on Stakeholders
For stakeholders, namely the companies involved and possibly other firms operating in similar sectors, the correction is critical. The proper identification of the respondent company ensures that the legal and procedural aspects of the investigation are accurately applied. For Jiaxing Guihua Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd., being correctly named is essential for properly addressing any legal matters associated with the investigation. Inaccurate legal documentation could result in procedural delays or misallocated responsibilities and penalties.
In summary, while this correction might appear trivial, its significance to ensuring accurate legal proceedings and the application of trade measures is substantial. This type of administrative diligence maintains the reliability and fairness expected in international trade regulations.
Issues
• The document involves a correction of a company name in a federal notice, which indicates a potential lack of attention to detail. However, this appears to be an administrative error rather than wasteful spending or favoritism.
• The language used in the document is formal and appropriate for a governmental notice, which may be perceived as complex for a general audience but is suitable for the intended professional audience.
• There are no apparent indications of spending that might be wasteful, or that favor particular organizations or individuals.
• The document does not exhibit any significantly unclear or ambiguous language, although it requires a specific understanding of the context involving countervailing duties.