FR 2025-01733

Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC has filed a request with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to abandon certain facilities, including a well and pipeline in Ohio. This action targets minimizing risks associated with the Brinker Storage Field. The public can participate in this process by submitting protests, motions to intervene, or comments up until March 17, 2025, at no cost.

General Overview

The document outlines a notice from Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC. They seek authorization to abandon facilities identified as part of the Brinker Well 4374 Abandonment Project in Ohio. This request is made under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) regulations. The anticipated cost for the project is $727,500. Columbia Gas aims to reduce integrity risks to the storage field, aligning with safety guidelines from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). The request is open to public inspection, and the FERC encourages electronic submissions for ease and efficiency.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One notable concern is the lack of detailed justification for the project’s estimated cost of $727,500. Without a breakdown or explanation, there may be questions about the potential for wasteful spending. Additionally, the document does not specify how Columbia Gas was chosen to undertake this project. This omission could prompt inquiries about possible favoritism or lack of competitive selection.

The document references various regulatory codes such as 18 CFR 157.205 and 18 CFR 385.214, which might be confusing to individuals without legal or regulatory expertise. While detailed instructions for public participation are provided, they could appear complex to those unfamiliar with FERC procedures and legal mechanisms. Furthermore, the document does not fully clarify the roles and responsibilities between Columbia Gas and the FERC, leading to potential confusion about accountability.

Public Impact

The impact on the broader public primarily involves the opportunity to participate in regulatory proceedings. Through protests, motions to intervene, and comments, the public can influence the decision on this project. The availability of electronic filing options and assistance indicates a move toward more inclusive and accessible participation. However, the complexity of the process and the regulatory language might create barriers for some individuals.

Stakeholder Impact

For stakeholders directly involved, such as landowners and environmental groups, the project could pose various implications. On the positive side, addressing integrity risks might enhance safety and prevent future environmental hazards. Conversely, stakeholders may have concerns about the environmental impact of abandoning the facilities and the adequacy of the consultation process.

Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC stands to benefit from regulatory approval, enabling them to proceed with the project without protracted disputes. Conversely, any delay or denial could result in operational setbacks or increased costs.

Ultimately, while the document outlines a procedural notice, the ultimate impact lies in the nuances of public engagement and regulatory scrutiny, where the public can assert their interests and influence the decision-making process.

In reviewing the Federal Register document concerning Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC's Brinker Well 4374 Abandonment Project, it’s important to focus on the financial implications and details provided. The document estimates the total cost of the project to be $727,500. This amount is intended to cover the expenses associated with the abandonment of one injection/withdrawal well and related facilities in Columbiana County, Ohio, as part of efforts to align with safety guidance issued by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.

Financial Summary

The document indicates that Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC has filed for authorization to proceed with the abandonment project under the company's existing blanket certificate. The projected cost for this undertaking is $727,500, which is recorded with the Commission and is available for public inspection. This sum is intended to address potential integrity risks associated with the well in question and its immediate infrastructure.

Financial Issues and Concerns

One of the key issues related to this financial reference is the lack of detailed justification for the estimated cost of $727,500. While the document lists this amount, it does not provide comprehensive details on how these funds will be allocated across different components of the project. Without such specificity, it becomes challenging for stakeholders to assess whether the spending is efficient or if the cost estimations are inflated.

Furthermore, the document does not clarify the selection process that led to Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC being responsible for this project. This could raise questions about whether the financial allocation reflects any favoritism towards a particular organization. Stakeholders might seek transparency in terms of bidding or selection processes to ensure that financial allocations are justified and fair.

Given these concerns, the absence of transparency in the cost breakdown could lead to skepticism from the public and stakeholders who may question the necessity and reasoning behind the financial figures stated. It underscores the necessity for clearer financial reporting and thorough explanation to foster trust and accountability in public spending.