FR 2025-01718

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Economic Surveys of Specific U.S. Commercial Fisheries

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government wants to ask people who catch fish for a living about their earnings and costs, so they can make better rules about fishing. They want people to give feedback on this plan to make sure it's easy and fair for the fishermen.

Summary AI

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), part of the Department of Commerce, is inviting public comments on a new information collection related to U.S. commercial fisheries. The goal is to gather economic data to better manage marine resources and support laws like the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. They aim to collect information about costs, earnings, and other economic factors from various fisheries, focusing on a different set each year to reduce the burden on respondents. This data will help NOAA and other agencies make informed decisions regarding the fishing industry.

Abstract

The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment on the proposed new information collection prior to the submission of the information collection request (ICR) to OMB for approval.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 8121
Document #: 2025-01718
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 8121-8122

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register outlines a notice by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) seeking public comment on economic surveys of specific U.S. commercial fisheries. This ongoing process is intended to gather detailed economic data from various fishing industries to improve the management of marine resources. The public and other Federal agencies are encouraged to participate in commenting, which, according to the document, will guide the refinement of data collection processes.

General Summary

The notice, driven by NOAA and falling under the Department of Commerce, aims to collect comprehensive economic data from a broad array of U.S. commercial fisheries to assist with legal and regulatory obligations. The data collected concerns operating costs, vessel details, labor, and more, which are then used to make informed resource management decisions. The document outlines a plan to accept public comments for a period of 60 days before the information collection request is submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from the document that merit consideration. Firstly, the document does not detail the specific budget or funding allocated for these activities, making it challenging to evaluate the potential for inefficiency or waste. Additionally, the language throughout the document is occasionally complex, using technical terms and acronyms, which may not be easily understood by all members of the public. This complexity could hinder layperson participation in the commenting process.

Moreover, while the document mentions various laws that necessitate economic data collection, it does not clearly express how the collected data directly benefits the fishing communities or supports them practically. Furthermore, the confidentiality aspects and data privacy rights related to respondents' information are not thoroughly explained, possibly leading to concerns about how data will be handled.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this document highlights efforts to involve the public in the regulatory process affecting commerce and the environment. For the general public, particularly individuals and businesses involved with the fishing industry, this presents an opportunity to influence how information that impacts their livelihoods is collected and used. Participation in this process can help ensure that data collection practices are fair and transparent and do not overburden respondents.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders within the fisheries industry, such as vessel operators and fishing businesses, the document's initiatives could bear significant influence. Positively, effective data collection can lead to better-informed policy decisions that might foster sustainable fishing practices and fair regulation. Conversely, if burdensome or intrusive, the surveys could negatively impact stakeholders by imposing additional workload or by misrepresenting economic realities if the collected data is inadequate or misused.

In summary, NOAA's initiative underscores the importance of economic data in sustaining healthy and productive fisheries. However, addressing the identified issues, such as simplifying communication and clarifying data benefits and privacy measures, could enhance the overall effectiveness and reception of this document’s intent.

Financial Assessment

The notice from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) through the Department of Commerce, provides an update on the process for public comment regarding the continuation of economic surveys of specific U.S. commercial fisheries. An important aspect of such documentation often includes details regarding the financial implications of these activities. However, this particular document provides limited information in that regard.

Financial Reference

The document explicitly mentions that the Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public is $0. This indicates that the public will not incur direct out-of-pocket expenses related to these data collection activities. However, it does not provide information on the actual costs borne by government agencies or detail how funding will be allocated and utilized within federal budgeting for these surveys.

Analysis of Financial References

In reviewing the financial details, or lack thereof, a few key issues become apparent:

  1. Unspecified Budget Details: The document does not specify the total budget allocated for conducting these surveys or the associated administrative costs. For stakeholders or interested members of the public, understanding the complete financial scope would be crucial in assessing the potential for efficient or wasteful spending. Without these details, any meaningful commentary on the financial stewardship of the program is limited.

  2. Public Clarity and Comprehension: The document mentions that there is no cost to the public, which could convey that there are no financial consequences for participation in the surveys. However, without clear budgetary information, it is unclear if this remains true across various aspects of the project or if taxpayers indirectly shoulder the cost through government funding.

  3. Relation to Issues: In the absence of specified financial allocations, it becomes challenging to address concerns related to potential wasteful spending or misallocation of funds. Similarly, without clear financial documentation, the ability to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the surveys in achieving their stated goals is hampered.

Conclusion

Overall, while the document indicates there is no direct cost to the public, the omission of broader financial details limits the ability to fully understand the economic implications of the information collections. Future commentary or evaluations would benefit from a more comprehensive financial breakdown, including government spending, to provide stakeholders with a full picture of the financial dynamics involved.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the specific budget or funding amount allocated for these data collection activities, making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending.

  • • The language used in the document is complex in areas, such as the explanation of the various surveys and data collection methods, which could be simplified for better comprehension by the general public.

  • • The document includes a range of technical terms and acronyms (e.g., NOAA, OMB, PRA) that could be confusing for individuals not familiar with these terms.

  • • There is no information on how the collected data will directly benefit the fisheries involved or their broader communities, leaving the practical utility of the information collection somewhat unclear.

  • • The potential respondents' obligations and rights regarding confidentiality and data usage are not thoroughly clarified in the document, which could raise concerns about data privacy.

  • • Despite mentioning that the survey participation is voluntary, there is no clear explanation of the potential impacts or consequences for those who choose not to participate in the data collection.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,749
Sentences: 89
Entities: 150

Language

Nouns: 717
Verbs: 103
Adjectives: 75
Adverbs: 12
Numbers: 75

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.14
Average Sentence Length:
19.65
Token Entropy:
5.47
Readability (ARI):
15.96

Reading Time

about 6 minutes