Overview
Title
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; U.S. Caribbean Commercial Fishermen Census
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The government wants to ask fishermen in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands some questions to help take care of the fish and ocean. They're looking for people to tell them what they think about these questions and how everything will be kept private and safe.
Summary AI
The Department of Commerce is seeking public comments on its information collection request related to the U.S. Caribbean Commercial Fishermen Census. This data collection, managed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, aims to gather information from fishermen in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands to improve fishery management and meet legal requirements. The survey involves around 1,500 respondents, taking an average of 45 minutes each, and is conducted annually. Public comments can be submitted within 30 days, and further details can be accessed on the website www.reginfo.gov.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document is a notice from the Department of Commerce inviting public comments on an information collection request concerning the U.S. Caribbean Commercial Fishermen Census. Managed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, this initiative aims to compile data from fishermen in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The survey will be conducted annually, requiring approximately 45 minutes per respondent across 1,500 participants. The purpose of this data collection is to support fishery management by providing necessary socio-economic information and to fulfill various legal requirements put forth by federal acts and orders. Members of the public have a 30-day window to submit comments, which can be facilitated through the website www.reginfo.gov.
Significant Issues and Concerns
While the initiative aims to gather essential socio-economic data to aid in fishery management, several concerns emerge from the document. First, there is a commitment to minimizing the public's reporting burden, yet specific measures on how this will be achieved remain unmentioned. Additionally, the connection between the gathered data and its application in fishery management remains somewhat ambiguous. While the document notes the data will assist in regulatory amendments and decision-making, detailed explanations of these processes are absent.
Another issue pertains to confidentiality. The document does not outline how sensitivity concerning respondents' data will be managed, a crucial factor in any data collection effort. Furthermore, the document's mention of "miscellaneous attitudinal questions" lacks specificity. A clearer description of the attitudes explored could provide better insight into the survey's scope and intended outcomes.
Finally, there appears to be no mention of potential incentives for survey participants. Incentives could increase participation rates and ensure a more comprehensive data collection.
Broad Public Impact
The announcement signals the government's recognition of the need for comprehensive socio-economic data to develop effective fishery management strategies. By encouraging the collection of detailed information, the public theoretically stands to benefit from more informed and tailored policies that could sustainably manage fishing resources in the U.S. Caribbean.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For commercial fishermen in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, this data collection represents an opportunity to have their operational and economic realities reflected in policy-making. It may lead to regulatory amendments that could either positively or negatively impact their livelihoods depending on the analysis and resulting decisions.
Other stakeholders like environmental organizations and local businesses indirectly involved in the fishing industry might find this data valuable for advocating sustainable practices and understanding market dynamics. However, without assurances of how the collected data will remain confidential, fishermen might be hesitant to participate, potentially undermining the survey's effectiveness.
In conclusion, while this document lays a foundational step toward enhancing fishery management, significant improvements could be made to ensure clarity, public understanding, and effective data utilization. Such improvements would not only aid in precision and engagement but would also bolster confidence among respondents to participate actively.
Issues
• The document mentions that the public's reporting burden is minimized, but it does not provide specific details on how it plans to achieve this.
• The document lacks detail on how the socio-economic data collected will directly impact fishery management decisions.
• There is no explanation of how confidentiality of the respondents' data will be maintained.
• The legal authority section is concise but does not explain how each act or order specifically relates to this information collection.
• The phrase 'miscellaneous attitudinal questions' is vague and could be clarified to specify what kind of attitudes are being measured.
• There is no mention of any potential financial or material incentives for respondents to encourage participation in the census.