FR 2025-01623

Overview

Title

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Change To Amend the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The SEC is letting everyone know that the NYSE American wants to change some rules about how much money brokers pay and earn on certain deals to make things fairer. People can tell the SEC what they think about this change until February 13, 2025.

Summary AI

The Securities and Exchange Commission published a notice regarding a proposed change submitted by the NYSE American LLC. The change aims to update the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule by modifying the Floor Broker Fixed Cost Prepayment Incentive Program. This includes changes like increasing required volumes for certain credits and introducing new rebates. The proposal, filed on January 15, 2025, is intended to take immediate effect, and the Commission is seeking public comments on this proposal by February 13, 2025.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 8071
Document #: 2025-01623
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 8071-8072

AnalysisAI

The Federal Register recently published a notice regarding a proposal by the NYSE American LLC to modify its Options Fee Schedule. This change, filed on January 15, 2025, introduces several amendments to the Floor Broker Fixed Cost Prepayment Incentive Program. The proposed alterations aim to increase the manual and QCC trading volumes required for brokers to obtain additional credits, establish a new rebate based on Firm Facilitation volume, raise the maximum for combined credits, and ensure that brokers undergoing restructuring can retain their status. This proposal is intended to take immediate effect, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) inviting public comments until February 13, 2025.

General Concerns

One of the significant concerns arising from this document is the volatility in the filing process. The proposal went through multiple cycles of withdrawal and replacement (SR-NYSEAmer-2024-83, SR-NYSEAmer-2025-02, and SR-NYSEAmer-2025-03) within a short period. This sequence of events might suggest instability or confusion in the proposed changes. Such frequent amendments could indicate a lack of clear policy direction or insufficient stakeholder consultation, raising potential issues of wastefulness and inefficiency.

Furthermore, the language employed in the proposal, involving terms like "QCC trades," "Manual Billable Rebate Program," and "Firm Facilitation volume," seems quite technical. This complexity could alienate individuals not well-versed in securities exchange jargon, potentially leading to misunderstandings about the rule changes.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

The proposal's impact on the public could vary. For the general audience, the amendments might remain abstract and technical without a direct effect on everyday life. However, for stakeholders within the trading community, particularly Floor Brokers, the changes could have significant implications.

The increase in required trading volumes and the introduction of new rebates could favor larger Floor Brokers capable of meeting these thresholds. Smaller brokers, or new entrants lacking the capacity or resources to achieve these volumes, might find themselves at a disadvantage. This adjustment could inadvertently consolidate market control among larger, more established players, potentially limiting competition within the exchange.

Additionally, the document's lack of clarity on how restructuring of Floor Brokers is handled within the FB Prepay Program presents another concern. There is little detail on how these processes will be regulated, creating an area that could be open to manipulation or inconsistencies in application.

Conclusion

While the NYSE American LLC's proposed changes to the Options Fee Schedule might aim to streamline and enhance trading processes within the exchange, the execution and communication of these changes necessitate careful scrutiny. The SEC's invitation for public comment is an opportunity for both industry insiders and the broader public to voice concerns and seek clarifications, ensuring that the final implementation of this rule change is both clear and equitable for all parties involved.

Issues

  • • The document references multiple filings (SR-NYSEAmer-2024-83, SR-NYSEAmer-2025-02, SR-NYSEAmer-2025-03) that were withdrawn and replaced within a short time frame, which may suggest instability or lack of clarity in the proposed changes. This could be seen as potentially wasteful or inefficient.

  • • The Fee Schedule amendments could potentially favor larger Floor Brokers with the means to meet increased volume requirements, potentially disadvantaging smaller brokers or new market entrants.

  • • The language used to describe the changes, such as 'Floor Broker Fixed Cost Prepayment Incentive Program' and 'Firm Facilitation volume,' may be overly complex for individuals not familiar with securities exchange terminology, which could lead to misunderstanding.

  • • The document does not provide clear explanations or definitions for terms like 'QCC trades,' 'Manual Billable Rebate Program,' or 'Firm Facilitation volume,' which could cause confusion.

  • • There is a lack of detailed explanation on how the restructuring of Floor Brokers within the FB Prepay Program is handled, which might create ambiguity or opportunities for misuse.

  • • The rapid succession of filing, withdrawal, and replacement suggests a lack of thorough preparation or consultation potentially raising concerns about procedural transparency or stakeholder engagement.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 972
Sentences: 29
Entities: 101

Language

Nouns: 298
Verbs: 85
Adjectives: 35
Adverbs: 23
Numbers: 67

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.68
Average Sentence Length:
33.52
Token Entropy:
5.22
Readability (ARI):
25.65

Reading Time

about 4 minutes