FR 2025-01550

Overview

Title

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Establish Fees for Industry Members Related to Reasonably Budgeted CAT Costs of the National Market System Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail for 2025

Agencies

ELI5 AI

Nasdaq wants to charge fees to cover some costs for a system that tracks trading activities, and they have asked the SEC for approval. People can tell the SEC what they think about this by February 13, 2025.

Summary AI

Nasdaq BX, Inc. has introduced a proposed rule change to establish fees for Industry Members to cover budgeted costs related to the Consolidated Audit Trail for 2025. This proposal has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and has been marked for immediate effectiveness. The SEC is seeking comments from the public on whether this change aligns with the Securities Exchange Act. Interested parties can submit their comments online or via mail by February 13, 2025.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 8069
Document #: 2025-01550
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 8069-8069

AnalysisAI

The Federal Register document details a notice regarding a proposed rule change filed by Nasdaq BX, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This proposed change seeks to establish fees for Industry Members, which refers to members of national securities exchanges or associations. These fees are intended to cover the budgeted costs associated with the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) for 2025. The CAT is a regulatory tool intended to help track trading activity in the U.S. securities markets. The SEC has designated this proposal as effective immediately, pursuant to certain regulations. They are also soliciting public comments on the matter until February 13, 2025.

Summary of the Document

Nasdaq BX, Inc.'s proposal aims to put in place a fee structure to finance the operations of the CAT for the year 2025. While the filing is intended to take effect immediately, there is an opportunity for public input. The SEC encourages interested parties to provide feedback on whether this rule change aligns with the Securities Exchange Act, either online or via traditional mail.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One key issue is the lack of clarity around what constitutes "reasonably budgeted CAT costs." Without specific definitions, stakeholders may face uncertainty regarding the financial commitments being required of them. Additionally, the document's language, particularly regarding the definition of "Industry Member," could be too specialized for those not familiar with regulatory or financial terminology. This complexity might prevent some readers from fully grasping the implications of the rule change.

Moreover, the notice does not provide a detailed breakdown of the specific fees that will be introduced, leaving industry members without a clear understanding of the financial impact. Finally, while the document allows for public comments, there is no clear explanation of how these comments will be addressed or influence any potential revisions to the rule change.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly speaking, the document signals a regulatory change that may indirectly affect the public by influencing the operations of securities markets, which could, in turn, affect trading behaviors and potentially market prices. For specific stakeholders, particularly members of securities exchanges, the introduction of new fees could have financial implications, impacting their operating expenses.

For those opposed to the fees, the opportunity to comment offers a chance to voice concerns and possibly influence the final outcome. Conversely, for those who support transparent market operations, the fees might be viewed as an appropriate investment in a comprehensive audit trail that seeks to enhance market integrity and protect investors.

In conclusion, while the document represents an administrative step toward implementing necessary infrastructure for market oversight, stakeholders must be vigilant in assessing how these changes may affect them, both financially and operationally. The public's engagement, via the comment period, remains a crucial aspect of how well the proposal will be received and refined to meet the needs of all involved parties.

Issues

  • • The document does not explain clearly what constitutes 'reasonably budgeted CAT costs' which could lead to ambiguous interpretation.

  • • The language used in defining 'Industry Member' might be overly complex for individuals not familiar with specific Nasdaq or SEC terminologies.

  • • There is no detailed breakdown or explanation of the specific fees being introduced for the industry members, making it difficult to ascertain the financial impact.

  • • The procedure for how comments will be considered or addressed by the Commission after submission is not clearly outlined.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 913
Sentences: 31
Entities: 79

Language

Nouns: 286
Verbs: 73
Adjectives: 30
Adverbs: 24
Numbers: 57

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.91
Average Sentence Length:
29.45
Token Entropy:
5.23
Readability (ARI):
24.71

Reading Time

about 3 minutes