FR 2025-01505

Overview

Title

Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC; Notice of Application and Establishing Intervention Deadline

Agencies

ELI5 AI

Gulf South Pipeline wants to dig a hole in Texas to see if they can store gas underground, and people can say what they think about it until February 5, 2025. Everyone can look at the plans online, but they need to know how to use the internet to see them.

Summary AI

Gulf South Pipeline Company has submitted an application to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to drill a stratigraphic test well in Wharton County, Texas, to explore the potential for creating a natural gas storage facility. This notice lays out how the public can get involved by commenting, protesting, or intervening in the decision-making process about this project, with a deadline for interventions set for February 5, 2025. Interested parties can access all the documents related to this application on the FERC website and utilize the eLibrary to monitor updates throughout the project review. The notice also provides details for submitting comments and interventions through electronic or paper means.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 7689
Document #: 2025-01505
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 7689-7691

AnalysisAI

Gulf South Pipeline Company's recent application to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) seeks approval to drill a test well in Wharton County, Texas. This test aims to evaluate the potential for a natural gas storage facility. The notice outlines how the public can engage in the decision-making process, highlighting ways to comment, protest, or intervene, with a clear deadline of February 5, 2025.

Overview and Public Engagement

The document provides a comprehensive overview of the proposed project and offers detailed instructions for public participation. It welcomes comments from those supporting or objecting to the project. This inclusive approach allows for community feedback, ensuring various perspectives are considered during the review process. Public participation is facilitated through electronic or paper submissions, with electronic engagement encouraged.

However, the intricacy of legal terminology and regulatory references might present challenges to a lay audience. The document references multiple sections of the Code of Federal Regulations, possibly complicating comprehension for those without legal expertise. Although contact information for assistance is offered, more could be done to simplify the information.

Potential Barriers and Accessibility

The reliance on eFiling and the eLibrary for accessing and submitting documents raises concerns about accessibility, particularly for individuals lacking reliable internet access or technical proficiency. While electronic submission is efficient, it could inadvertently exclude some stakeholders, especially those in rural areas or those less familiar with digital platforms.

Moreover, there is no mention of outreach efforts to ensure that marginalized or less informed communities are adequately informed about the project. This gap could limit effective public engagement and participation.

Stakeholder Impact

For the general public, the project represents potential developments in energy infrastructure, possibly affecting future energy availability and pricing. However, concerns may arise regarding environmental or community impacts due to the test drilling. The document does not detail possible consequences, which could lead to apprehension among stakeholders looking for transparency in environmental stewardship.

For specific stakeholders, such as nearby residents or environmental groups, the project could have direct impacts on their community and the local environment. These parties might be motivated to engage actively through comments or interventions. Conversely, industry groups or businesses may view the project positively, aligning with interests in energy infrastructure expansion.

Conclusion

In summary, while the document effectively invites public participation in the review of Gulf South Pipeline Company's project, it also poses challenges due to its complex language and heavy reliance on digital processes. There's an opportunity for the Commission to improve accessibility and outreach, ensuring all demographics have the opportunity to be informed and involved. Clearer communication about potential environmental impacts would help stakeholders make informed decisions about their involvement and responses.

Issues

  • • The document uses complex legal language and references specific CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) sections. This could be challenging for individuals without legal expertise to fully understand.

  • • The process for filing comments, protests, and motions to intervene is detailed and may be difficult for members of the public to navigate without assistance.

  • • Although there is contact information provided for assistance, the document does not mention any specific outreach efforts to ensure that marginalized or less informed communities are aware of the project's potential impact and how to participate in the review process.

  • • The deadline for interventions and comments is clearly stated, but the explanation of how interventions differ from comments or protests might be confusing to individuals unfamiliar with legal proceedings.

  • • The notice heavily relies on electronic means for submissions and viewing documents (eFiling, eLibrary), which could be a barrier for individuals without reliable internet access or familiarity with digital platforms.

  • • The document does not specify any potential environmental or community impacts of drilling the stratigraphic test well, which may cause concern for stakeholders who are looking for that specific information.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 2,490
Sentences: 98
Entities: 231

Language

Nouns: 754
Verbs: 208
Adjectives: 92
Adverbs: 53
Numbers: 144

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.27
Average Sentence Length:
25.41
Token Entropy:
5.48
Readability (ARI):
19.66

Reading Time

about 9 minutes