Overview
Title
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection Renewal; Comment Request
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) wants people to share their thoughts on some forms that banks fill out about their services and safety rules, like being safe online and how they treat different people. They are asking for help to make sure these forms are important and easier to fill out.
Summary AI
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is inviting public comment on renewing three information collections as part of its Paperwork Reduction Act obligations. These include applications for banks seeking trust powers, assessments of diversity policies, and notifications of computer security incidents. The comment period is open until February 21, 2025, and feedback can be submitted via the FDIC website, email, mail, or hand delivery. The FDIC seeks input on the necessity, accuracy, and ways to reduce the burden of these information collections.
Abstract
The FDIC, as part of its obligations under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the request to renew the existing information collections described below (OMB Control No. 3064-0025; -0200 and -0214). The notices of proposed renewal for these information collections were previously published in the Federal Register on November 5, 2024, allowing for a 60-day comment period.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) invites public comment on proposals to renew three sets of information collections. These proposals are part of the FDIC's obligations under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The FDIC specifically seeks feedback on renewing applications concerning banks seeking trust powers, the assessment of diversity policies and practices, and the notification requirements for computer security incidents. The comment period is open until February 21, 2025. Interested parties can submit their comments through various methods, including email, the FDIC's website, mail, or hand delivery.
General Summary
The FDIC's document outlines a request for public input on three specific sets of data collections that impact banks and other financial entities. Each collection has a distinct purpose: assisting banks in exercising trust powers, promoting diversity policies, and managing computer security incidents. This initiative is a typical part of the regulatory process where agencies seek insights and opinions from the public to ensure that regulations are effective and not overly burdensome.
Significant Issues and Concerns
One notable concern is the document's utilization of technical jargon and references to specific legal frameworks, which could be challenging for individuals unfamiliar with regulatory language. Without simplifying these terms, the document might not be accessible to those who could be most affected. Furthermore, while the document mentions changes in the estimated hours required for compliance with these collections, it fails to justify these alterations adequately, leaving readers unclear about why these changes have occurred.
Another issue arises with the document's references to various Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control numbers and form numbers. These are mentioned without context or explanation, which could confuse those unfamiliar with how these numbers are used in regulatory processes.
Additionally, the submission process for comments could be perplexing, particularly the use of www.reginfo.gov, a website that might not be well known to the general public. More guidance on how to navigate this process could help ensure broader participation from interested parties.
Impact on the Public
The document has a broad impact on both the general public and specific stakeholders. Overall, it highlights regulations that affect financial organizations and their operations. For the general public, the importance of these collections may not be immediately apparent, but they relate indirectly to the safety, fairness, and reliability of financial services.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For financial institutions, particularly insured state nonmember banks, the renewals of these information collections could mean continued or adjusted operational requirements. The renewal of applications for trust powers may affect banks looking to expand their services. The focus on diversity in management and business practices aims to ensure fair representation, which can have positive long-term effects in fostering inclusive work environments within financial institutions. Lastly, the computer security incident notification requirements are crucial for maintaining the security and integrity of financial services, which is increasingly important in today's digital landscape.
While these proposals may uphold important regulatory standards, stakeholders might also find them burdensome, which could lead to increased administrative work. The FDIC encourages feedback to potentially ease these burdens while maintaining their regulatory objectives. However, it remains to be seen how straightforward these changes will be for financial institutions to implement, given the complexity and specificity of requirements.
Issues
• The document uses technical jargon and references specific legal acts and regulations which may not be easily understood by the general public.
• There is no clear explanation or justification for why the number of hours in the burden estimates for each information collection has changed from 2022 to 2025.
• The document references various OMB control numbers and form numbers without providing a clear explanation of their significance or role in the process.
• The instructions for submitting comments, particularly the use of www.reginfo.gov, could be confusing to individuals who are unfamiliar with this website or process.
• The overall structure of the information could be more logically organized to enhance readability and understanding.
• The notice does not provide specific examples or case studies to illustrate the practical utility or impact of the proposed information collections.