FR 2025-01387

Overview

Title

Information Collection Being Submitted for Review and Approval to Office of Management and Budget

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The FCC wants to hear from the public and small businesses about ways to make emergency call services better and less paperwork-heavy, especially for tiny businesses with less than 25 people working for them. They hope people give feedback so that everyone's emergency help can work smoother and easier for small companies.

Summary AI

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) invites the public and federal agencies to comment on a new information collection aimed at reducing paperwork burdens, especially for small businesses with fewer than 25 employees. This effort is in line with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002. The collection seeks to support the transition to Next Generation 911 (NG911) services, a newer, more effective emergency response system. The FCC is requesting comments by February 20, 2025, and provides detailed instructions for submission.

Abstract

As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, the FCC seeks specific comment on how it might "further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees." The Commission may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 7137
Document #: 2025-01387
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 7137-7138

AnalysisAI

The document seeks public commentary on a new information collection initiative proposed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). As part of its ongoing efforts to minimize paperwork burden, the FCC is addressing the transition to Next Generation 911 (NG911) services — a technologically advanced update to enhance emergency response capabilities. This initiative arises under the mandates of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, alongside considerations introduced by the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, which particularly emphasizes the alleviation of burdens for small businesses with fewer than 25 employees. Public comments and recommendations are invited until February 20, 2025.

General Concerns and Issues

One of the notable concerns is the complexity of legal references cited within the document, such as sections of the Communications Act of 1934 and various federal laws. These references are highly technical and may be challenging for those without specific legal or telecommunications expertise to grasp fully. While aiming for compliance and clarity, the FCC's use of legal jargon might inadvertently make the document less accessible to the general public and smaller businesses it targets for feedback.

The document estimates the time required for respondents to comply, ranging from 2 to 40 hours, which is quite broad. This variability may not adequately convey the actual workload anticipated for participants, particularly small businesses that may lack the resources of larger organizations. Furthermore, the estimated annual financial burden is communicated as $902,000, though details on how this total cost is broken down remain unspecified. This lack of transparency may raise questions about the justification of these costs.

Broad Public Impact

For the general public, the transition to NG911 services promises enhanced effectiveness in emergency response. This is a significant step forward for public safety, enabling more accurate and efficient communication during emergencies. However, ensuring the public understands how these changes benefit them and are implemented without unnecessary administrative burden remains critical.

Stakeholder Impact

Specific stakeholders, such as small businesses, state, local, or tribal governments, and other telecommunication entities, are directly impacted by this proposal. The FCC seeks to reduce bureaucratic loads on small businesses, yet the dense language and potential for extensive compliance requirements could negate these intended benefits.

Moreover, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control numbers serve as a point of compliance monitoring, but without a straightforward explanation or exemplification, it can be difficult for smaller enterprises to assess how these requirements might practically affect them or pose obstacles in their daily operations.

Finally, the document does not explicitly discuss alternative means to meet these informational requirements that might impose less strain on small businesses, despite its stated aim to solicit such feedback. This omission identifies a gap in addressing potential simplifications or innovations that could have reduced burdens more considerably.

Conclusion

In summary, while the FCC's notice is aligned with enhancing emergency communication systems and reducing informational burdens theoretically, its real-world execution may encounter hurdles due to complexity and transparency issues. Simplifying language, clarifying costs and impacts, and proposing concrete strategies for minimal disruption would likely contribute to smoother, more effective engagement with its intended audiences and beneficiaries.

Financial Assessment

In the document under review, there is a mention of a Total Annual Cost of $902,000 associated with implementing the rules related to the Next Generation 911 (NG911) services. This financial reference is central to understanding the overall economic impact of the new regulations being discussed. However, the document does not delve into a detailed breakdown of this cost, which could provide insights into how the funds will be utilized or allocated among different activities or responsibilities.

One issue is that the absence of a detailed cost breakdown makes it difficult to assess whether the spending is justified or potentially wasteful. For example, the document mentions that obligations include taking steps to complete translation and routing for 911 traffic, connectivity testing, and compliance with specified standards. Yet, it does not specify how much each of these elements contributes to the $902,000 total. This lack of transparency can lead to questions about the potential for excess or unnecessary expenditure, particularly when financial resources are limited.

Moreover, the range of estimated time per response—between 2 to 40 hours—highlights the varied effort levels required to meet these obligations. This broad range can indicate substantial cost variability, which is not clearly reconciled with the Total Annual Cost figure provided. It leaves room for speculation about whether the funds cover the lower end or the higher end of workload scenarios for small businesses.

Additionally, while the document’s primary focus is on minimizing the information collection burden for small businesses, it lacks a discussion on potential alternatives that could reduce costs without compromising the intended regulatory outcomes. This is particularly relevant given the document’s focus on seeking comments on how to alleviate these burdens effectively. Without explicit financial strategies or alternatives being presented, small businesses might find it challenging to provide informed feedback.

In summary, while the Total Annual Cost of $902,000 is stated, the absence of detailed financial breakdown and discussions on cost-saving alternatives limits the document’s effectiveness in addressing financial and economic concerns. More granularity and transparency would enhance understanding and enable stakeholders to assess the cost implications critically, especially for small businesses that may be more sensitive to these financial requirements.

Issues

  • • The document contains complex legal references (e.g., sections of the Communications Act of 1934 and federal law citations) that may be difficult for laypersons to understand without legal expertise.

  • • The estimated time per response for participants ranges from 2 to 40 hours, which is a broad range and may not clearly convey the expected workload for respondents, particularly small businesses.

  • • The overall language level used in describing compliance requirements, responsibilities of OSPs, and NG911 transition obligations is highly technical and may not be easily understandable to audiences without specific telecommunications industry knowledge.

  • • There is no clear explanation or example of a practical scenario where OMB control numbers and compliance measures would impact small businesses specifically.

  • • The 'Total Annual Cost' estimate of $902,000 is mentioned, but its breakdown and underlying costs are not provided, making it difficult to assess whether the spending is justified or potentially wasteful.

  • • The notice does not address any potentially preferential treatment for certain service providers or organizations, though the risk exists without clearer context or additional details.

  • • Potential alternatives to meet the information collection requirements with less burden on small businesses are not explicitly discussed, despite the document's intent to seek such feedback.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,975
Sentences: 57
Entities: 203

Language

Nouns: 631
Verbs: 178
Adjectives: 73
Adverbs: 23
Numbers: 130

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.96
Average Sentence Length:
34.65
Token Entropy:
5.48
Readability (ARI):
22.88

Reading Time

about 7 minutes