Overview
Title
Agency Information Collection Activities; 2025 Digital Development Awards Application
Agencies
ELI5 AI
USAID wants people to fill out a survey to help pick the best digital tech projects that make the world fairer. They're asking for thoughts on the survey by February 24, 2025, but it's not clear yet how they'll choose winners or keep everyone's info safe.
Summary AI
The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has announced a proposed information collection, inviting the public to participate in a survey connected to the 2025 Digital Development Awards. This survey aims to help select award winners who utilize digital technology for inclusive growth. Comments and recommendations on the survey are due by February 24, 2025. This action is in compliance with legal requirements, as USAID must notify the public and gain approval from the Office of Management and Budget before conducting such collections.
Abstract
The U.S. Agency for International Development's Innovation, Technology, and Research Hub invites the general public to review this new information collection. This survey is administered by the USAID Innovation, Technology, and Research Hub's Technology Division. Responses to this survey will be used to select the winners of the 2025 Digital Development Awards once the application opens next year. The Digital Development Awards recognize and celebrate USAID-funded projects and activities that harness the power of digital technology to promote inclusive growth.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
This document, issued by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), discusses a proposal for information collection related to the upcoming 2025 Digital Development Awards. The awards aim to recognize USAID-funded projects that leverage digital technology to foster inclusive growth. The agency is inviting public feedback on this proposal until February 24, 2025. This process is part of the agency's legal obligation to seek public input and obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) before moving forward with data collection efforts.
General Summary
USAID is seeking to identify and celebrate impactful projects through their Digital Development Awards, focusing on digital technology's role in enhancing growth and inclusion. The document stresses the importance of public participation in shaping the final design of the survey that will be used to evaluate potential awardees. As part of this effort, USAID provides detailed instructions for submitting comments and suggestions, including an online submission process.
Significant Issues and Concerns
A notable issue in the document is the lack of clarity regarding the criteria and process for selecting winners of the Digital Development Awards. Without clear guidelines or transparency about the evaluation method, stakeholders may find the process to be ambiguous. Additionally, while the document mentions the use of a Google Form for collecting survey responses, it does not address important data privacy concerns or detail measures to protect participant information. This omission could be troubling for potential applicants or respondents.
Furthermore, the technical language used in describing the public comments submission process could be confusing for individuals unfamiliar with such governmental procedures. Clearer instructions or a simplified explanation could enhance accessibility and encourage broader participation.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this document highlights the government's efforts to incorporate public input into important development initiatives. This can be seen as a positive move toward transparency and inclusivity, inviting citizens to have a say in how USAID operates and what kinds of projects get promoted.
However, the technical nature of the information provided might limit the ability of some individuals to effectively engage with the process. Providing clearer guidance could ensure more people feel empowered to contribute their thoughts and feedback.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Stakeholders, such as project teams funded by USAID, nonprofits, and technology innovators, may find the announcement of this information collection process both an opportunity and a challenge. On a positive note, these stakeholders have a chance to showcase their work on a broader platform through the Digital Development Awards. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria and data privacy concerns may generate uncertainty and hesitance among potential participants.
Moreover, without clear eligibility criteria, stakeholders may experience confusion about whether they qualify to apply for these awards. This could inadvertently discourage some deserving projects from applying, thereby impacting the diversity and range of entries USAID receives.
In conclusion, while the document's aim to engage the public in the USAID's Digital Development Awards initiative is commendable, addressing the identified issues and concerns will better serve both broad public interest and specific stakeholders who might participate in the awards process. Simplifying the language, clarifying the selection criteria, and providing assurances about privacy protection could increase engagement and trust in the process.
Issues
• The document does not provide specific criteria for how the winners of the Digital Development Awards will be selected, which could lead to ambiguity in the selection process.
• The language regarding the submission of comments to the website www.reginfo.gov is quite technical and may be difficult for the general public to understand without additional guidance.
• The document mentions the use of a Google Form for collecting responses but does not explain how data privacy will be ensured or discuss any measures in place to protect respondents' information.
• It is not clear if there are any eligibility criteria or restrictions for applying to the Digital Development Awards, which could lead to confusion among potential applicants.
• The currently provided contact information (email and phone number) does not specify the office hours or expected response time for inquiries, which might be useful for users attempting to get more information.