Overview
Title
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The government wants to see what people think about a plan to gather information about healthcare that helps improve programs like Medicare. People can share their thoughts by March 18, 2025, to let the government know if collecting this information is useful.
Summary AI
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has announced a period for public comments on its plan to collect information, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA). This information collection relates to Medicare coverage of items and services under the Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) initiative. The public is encouraged to submit comments on aspects such as the utility of the information collection and methods to improve efficiency. Comments must be submitted by March 18, 2025.
Abstract
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is announcing an opportunity for the public to comment on CMS' intention to collect information from the public. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information (including each proposed extension or reinstatement of an existing collection of information) and to allow 60 days for public comment on the proposed action. Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding our burden estimates or any other aspect of this collection of information, including the necessity and utility of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of the agency's functions, the accuracy of the estimated burden, ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology to minimize the information collection burden.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document, titled "Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request," published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), announces an opportunity for public comment on the agency's intention to collect information from the public. This process is part of the requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), which mandates federal agencies to solicit public feedback on any proposed information gathering initiative. Those interested are invited to comment on the practical aspects of the information collection, including its necessity, clarity, and potential to reduce administrative burden through automation or other technologies.
Summary and Purpose
The core purpose of this notice is to gather public input on the CMS initiative concerning Medicare Coverage of Items and Services for Coverage with Evidence Development (CED). The goal is to enhance the quality and utility of the data collection, which plays a crucial role in supporting Medicare coverage decisions. The public comment period is open until March 18, 2025, providing stakeholders ample time to share their perspectives and insights.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Several notable issues and concerns arise from the notice:
Lack of Clarity on Beneficiaries: The notice does not specify which entities or individuals benefit directly from this information collection. This omission can raise concerns about potential favoritism or priority given to specific groups over others.
Proprietary Data Collections: Mention is made of data collections being 'proprietary to the study sponsor,' yet it lacks clarity on which entities this applies to. Such vagueness could lead to misunderstandings about data ownership and use.
Reference to Criteria Unclear: The document references 'criteria 1-17' following the 2024 CED guidance document, yet does not provide explicit details, potentially confusing readers who do not have direct access to or familiarity with this document.
Complex Comment Submission Requirements: The specified methods for submitting comments may be perceived as overly complex, potentially discouraging participation from individuals unfamiliar with navigating formal federal processes.
Opaque Burden Estimate: The notice indicates a total annual burden estimate of 1,300 hours but does not provide detailed reasoning or calculations for this estimate, which may lead to perceptions of insufficient transparency.
Impact on the Public
On a broad scale, the general public could experience both benefits and challenges. The opportunity for public comment empowers citizens and organizations to influence federal processes, ideally leading to information collection initiatives that are both effective and minimally burdensome. However, the complexities and unclear elements of the notice might deter engagement from some members of the public.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Certain stakeholders, like private sector firms and not-for-profits involved in healthcare, stand to gain directly from clearer and more efficient data collection processes, potentially easing compliance burdens and enhancing collaboration opportunities with CMS. Conversely, small businesses or less experienced entities might struggle with the complexities of submission requirements and criteria interpretations, possibly affecting their ability to participate effectively in the comment process.
In summary, while the notice offers a valuable opportunity for public input on crucial healthcare processes, it could be improved by addressing the noted concerns to enhance engagement, transparency, and equity among potential contributors.
Issues
• The notice does not clearly outline specific entities or individuals who would benefit directly from this information collection, raising questions about favoritism.
• The mention of 'proprietary to the study sponsor' regarding data collections in CED studies lacks clarity regarding which entities might gain proprietary control.
• The document refers to 'criteria 1-17' without providing specific details, which may be confusing for those unfamiliar with the 2024 CED guidance document.
• The requirement for comments to be submitted by specific methods or references may be overly complex for some public commenters, potentially limiting participation.
• The burden estimate of 1,300 total annual hours without detailed reasoning may be considered insufficiently transparent about how these estimates were calculated.