Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The government is checking new rules for how much a big gas pipe company can charge, and people who care about these rules can ask questions or say if they think they're wrong by a certain date.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced that it has received a series of filings related to Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Reports. These include a specific rate filing by Rockies Express Pipeline LLC, which is set to take effect on January 11, 2025. Individuals interested in becoming involved in these proceedings can file interventions, protests, or answers to complaints according to the Commission's regulations by January 22, 2025. The public can find more information and access these filings through the Commission’s eLibrary system or seek assistance from FERC's Office of Public Participation.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The Federal Register document in question serves as a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) about newly received filings concerning Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Reports. One notable filing mentioned is from Rockies Express Pipeline LLC regarding a negotiated rate agreement, set to be effective from January 11, 2025. This process is part of the regulatory framework aimed at reviewing and overseeing pipeline rates and refund issues, which are crucial for maintaining fair and competitive pricing in the energy market.
General Summary
The document announces the receipt of a specific rate filing and provides procedural information for individuals or entities interested in engaging with the proceedings. The notice indicates that those who wish to intervene, protest, or answer complaints must adhere to specific filing regulations by January 22, 2025. Additionally, the document points the public to resources and contacts for further assistance, emphasizing the role of FERC's Office of Public Participation in aiding the public's involvement.
Significant Issues and Concerns
One of the foremost concerns is the complexity of the document due to its specialized legal and procedural language. For a general audience, especially those without a background in regulatory processes, the text may seem dense and difficult to navigate. This complexity could hinder public engagement and participation, as the procedures outlined may be overwhelming for newcomers to these regulatory environments.
Furthermore, while the Office of Public Participation is highlighted as a resource, the document lacks detailed guidance on how precisely this office can assist individuals in understanding and participating in these proceedings. Additionally, there is no mention of language accessibility support, which could be a barrier for non-English speakers.
Broad Public Impact
For the general public, particularly those affected by natural gas pipeline issues, this notice represents an opportunity to engage with regulatory proceedings that could impact their energy costs and local environments. However, the technical nature of the document may deter meaningful participation unless further efforts are made to simplify the process and enhance accessibility.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impact:
- Energy companies and legal professionals familiar with FERC's processes may benefit from the structured procedural framework provided in the notice, which outlines clear steps for intervention and response.
Negative Impact:
- Community groups, landowners near pipeline routes, and environmental advocacy organizations may find it challenging to interpret the document or contribute effectively to the proceedings due to its complexity and lack of detailed guidance.
In summary, while the document fulfills its role as a formal notice within regulatory processes, there is room for improvement in making such communications more accessible and user-friendly. Enhancing clarity and support mechanisms, particularly for those less familiar with regulatory environments, would likely foster greater public participation and ensure diverse stakeholder engagement in these important proceedings.
Issues
• The document does not disclose any specific spending details, making it difficult to assess for wasteful spending or favoritism.
• The notice contains specialized legal and procedural language that might be complex for the general public to understand. Ensuring clarity and accessibility for non-experts could improve transparency and participation.
• The instructions for intervention, protest, and access to information, while detailed, may be overwhelming for individuals unfamiliar with regulatory processes, potentially discouraging public engagement.
• The notice mentions support from the Commission's Office of Public Participation but does not provide detailed information on how they can specifically assist the public with the procedures mentioned.
• The document provides contact information for assistance but does not specify language accessibility resources for non-English speakers.