FR 2025-01150

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Public Comment Request; Maternal and Child Health Jurisdictional Survey Instrument for the Title V MCH Block Grant Program

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government wants to ask moms and kids in U.S. territories questions to see how a special health program is working. They are checking with a big office to make sure it’s okay to ask these questions and want people to say what they think about this plan by February 18, 2025.

Summary AI

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) has submitted a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approve their Information Collection Request (ICR) related to a survey for the Title V Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Block Grant Program. This survey aims to gather data on the health of mothers and children in specific U.S. territories to assess the program's impact and help meet federal reporting standards. Public comments on the proposed information collection are invited until February 18, 2025. The survey will increase its sample sizes and update its questions to align with new federal data standards.

Abstract

In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, HRSA submitted an Information Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. Comments submitted during the first public review of this ICR will be provided to OMB. OMB will accept further comments from the public during the review and approval period. OMB may act on HRSA's ICR only after the 30-day comment period for this notice has closed.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 5913
Document #: 2025-01150
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 5913-5915

AnalysisAI

General Summary

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), a part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, is seeking approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) concerning an Information Collection Request (ICR) tied to the Title V Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Block Grant Program. The key function of this proposal is to conduct a survey in several U.S. territories, including Puerto Rico and Guam, to gather crucial data about the health status of mothers and children. This initiative primarily aims to ensure these jurisdictions meet federal reporting requirements and measure the effectiveness of the MCH Block Grant Program. Public input on this data collection effort is encouraged until February 18, 2025.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The document, laden with technical jargon such as "ICR" and "performance measure framework," might be challenging for the general public to comprehend, potentially hindering effective public participation. Moreover, instructions about submitting comments through the designated website might be insufficiently clear. The absence of detailed information regarding the cost implications and funding for the expanded survey casts shadows on financial transparency and accountability. Additionally, the discussion of updated federal data standards lacks clarity, making it difficult for laypersons to grasp the full implications.

Impact on the Public Broadly

For the general public, especially residents of the involved jurisdictions, this effort could bring about a more profound understanding of their healthcare challenges and needs. The collected data might support enhanced healthcare policies and programs tailored to improve maternal and child health metrics. However, understanding the document is imperative for public engagement, as informed feedback could significantly influence HRSA's plans and operations.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

This initiative presents a dual-sided impact on different stakeholders.

  • Healthcare Providers and State Health Agencies: These entities might find themselves better equipped with data to address health disparities and improve service delivery. The survey will provide valuable insights into healthcare barriers, needs, and outcomes within their jurisdictions.

  • Residents of the Involved Jurisdictions: Women and children in the territories targeted by the survey stand to benefit from potentially improved healthcare policies and funding allocations tailored to their specific needs.

  • Organizations and Advocates for Maternal and Child Health: These stakeholders could leverage survey findings to advocate for better resources and favorable policies, but they must understand the data's limitations and scope to maximize utility effectively.

While this proposal has the potential for substantial positive impact, the success of these proposed changes will largely depend on the clear communication of both the survey's purposes and the mechanisms for public involvement in the process.

Issues

  • • The document uses jargon and technical terms (e.g., 'ICR', 'OMB No. 0906-0042', 'performance measure framework') that might not be easily understood by the general public, potentially limiting accessibility and clarity.

  • • The statement detailing where to send comments and recommendations ('Written comments and recommendations...to www.reginfo.gov') could be clearer regarding how individuals unfamiliar with the process can navigate the website or submit their input.

  • • The document does not provide specific information regarding the cost of conducting the MCH Jurisdictional Survey, potentially obscuring financial transparency and accountability.

  • • The mention of increasing sample sizes without detailed context on how funding will be affected or allocated could lead to questions regarding budgeting and resource management.

  • • The 'Burden Statement' involves complex considerations such as time for technology system management, training, and data transmission that could be more simply summarized to enhance comprehension.

  • • The document references specific federal data standards updates (based on OMB guidance) without sufficient explanation of the implications or the nature of these updates in layman's terms.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 1,677
Sentences: 47
Entities: 142

Language

Nouns: 624
Verbs: 151
Adjectives: 65
Adverbs: 23
Numbers: 74

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.22
Average Sentence Length:
35.68
Token Entropy:
5.51
Readability (ARI):
24.72

Reading Time

about 6 minutes