Overview
Title
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection; Record of Employee Interview; OMB Control No.: 2501-0009
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Department of Housing and Urban Development wants people to give their thoughts on some paperwork they plan to use when they talk to workers about their pay on projects that get help from HUD. They're checking to make sure the work rules are fair, and people can share their ideas until February 18, 2025.
Summary AI
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has announced a 30-day notice seeking public comments on a proposed information collection related to the "Record of Employee Interview." This collection is meant to help enforce federal wage provisions on HUD-assisted construction projects, as required by regulations. The public is invited to comment on the necessity and effectiveness of the proposed information collection, as well as ways to reduce the burden on those who need to respond. Interested individuals can submit their feedback by February 18, 2025, via the provided contact details and website.
Abstract
HUD is seeking approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comment from all interested parties on the proposed collection of information. The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days of public comment.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) has issued a 30-day notice inviting public comments on a proposed information collection effort called the "Record of Employee Interview." This process is integral to enforcing federal wage provisions, particularly those relevant to HUD-assisted construction projects. The document outlines the notice, provides a contact for further information, and solicits public feedback concerning the necessity, accuracy, and potential improvements for the information collection method.
General Summary
The notice, published in the Federal Register, is part of HUD's compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, requiring agencies to seek public input on data collection practices. The primary aim of this collection is to bolster enforcement of federal wage requirements through employee interviews, as stipulated by regulations from the Department of Labor. HUD has made provisions for public comments to be submitted until February 18, 2025.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Some issues arise from the documentation provided. Notably, the notice lacks specific details on the estimated burden of the information collection process on respondents. Without this information, it is difficult for stakeholders to assess whether the process might lead to wasteful spending of time and resources. Moreover, there is no clarification on the amount of time or resources required by HUD and local agencies to enforce the specified wage and reporting requirements. Additionally, the instructions for using forms HUD-11 and HUD-11-SP are not thoroughly detailed, which may create confusion. Finally, there is some repetitiveness in the document regarding the strategies for minimizing respondent burden, which could be streamlined for clarity.
Impact on the Public
The broad public interest lies in ensuring that federal wage regulations are properly enforced. HUD's effort to collect this information is an important step in maintaining transparency and accountability in public projects. However, given that the process may impose burdens on respondents, clarity around these requirements—and any potential costs involved—is crucial for public understanding and compliance.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders such as laborers and mechanics working on HUD-assisted projects, this process can ensure they receive fair wages as mandated by federal law. However, there is a potential negative impact if the process proves cumbersome or lacks transparency. For businesses involved in construction and maintenance, understanding their responsibilities regarding these interviews and the associated paperwork is vital for compliance. Clarity and simplification in the documentation process would mitigate burdens on these parties, fostering a more cooperative regulatory environment.
Ultimately, while HUD's notice seeks to enhance wage enforcement on federally assisted projects, key areas could benefit from greater detail and clarity to avoid unnecessary burdens and ensure effective implementation. Engaging stakeholders through comprehensive, accessible communication will be essential to achieving these goals.
Issues
• The document lacks specific details about the estimated burden of information collection on respondents, which could be useful for evaluating potential wasteful spending.
• The notice does not specify the amount of time or resources required for HUD and local agencies to enforce Federal Wage and reporting requirements, which could lead to wasteful spending without proper estimation.
• The language used in the document regarding enforcement activities and the use of forms (HUD-11 and HUD-11-SP) could be clarified to ensure better understanding among stakeholders.
• There is some repetitiveness in Section B regarding ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information, which could be streamlined for clarity.