Overview
Title
National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The National Cancer Institute decided to change the date of a special online meeting, so instead of happening on February 24, 2025, it will be on March 10, 2025, and this meeting is just for invited people, not everyone can join.
Summary AI
The National Cancer Institute has announced a change in the date for a special meeting initially planned for February 24, 2025. The meeting will now take place on March 10, 2025, from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. The format, location, and timing of the meeting will remain unchanged, and it will be conducted virtually. This meeting will be closed to the public.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The notice in question pertains to an announcement from the National Cancer Institute about a change in the date for a special meeting. This meeting, initially scheduled for February 24, 2025, has been moved to March 10, 2025. While the date has shifted, the timing, format, and location details remain unchanged for this virtual meeting, which will take place from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. It is important to note that this meeting is closed to the public.
General Summary of the Document
The notice is primarily an update regarding the scheduling of a meeting conducted by the National Cancer Institute’s Special Emphasis Panel, specifically designated for SBIR (Small Business Innovation Research) Review. The initial schedule and location details were published on December 26, 2024, in the Federal Register. This amended notice serves to inform relevant parties about the change in the meeting date.
Significant Issues or Concerns
A few concerns can be identified in the document's presentation. Firstly, although the meeting is described as virtual, it lists a physical address, which could create confusion. There may be implications for those seeking to attend if the mode of the meeting was different from what they expected. Secondly, the notice mentions that the meeting is closed to the public without providing a rationale. This lack of transparency could raise questions regarding the nature of the meeting and why public oversight is not permitted. In addition, the document does not specify the agenda or topics to be discussed, which could be helpful in understanding the importance and relevance of the meeting.
Furthermore, the document refers to a previous Federal Register entry without summarizing it, which might compel interested parties to conduct additional research to gather the full context. Lastly, considering that the meeting involves a Special Emphasis Panel for an SBIR Review, additional details could shed light on the potential impact or focus of the discussions on small businesses or industries involved.
Broad Public Impact
For the general public, this document might not have a direct impact due to its technical nature and the specific professional focus of the meeting. However, understanding and fostering transparency in governmental processes can be a broader public concern. Changes in meeting dates, especially for panels that might influence significant funding or research directions, may hold indirect implications for innovation and public health advancements.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders within the scientific and research communities, particularly those involved in federal research funding like SBIR, this notice is crucial. Changes in meeting dates can affect their preparation and participation. The lack of public access may also be a concern for stakeholders who are interested in the discussions or outcomes of the meeting but are not directly involved. This could potentially exclude a wider range of viewpoints and expertise that might benefit the outcomes of such deliberations.
In conclusion, while this notice primarily serves an administrative function, it also highlights certain areas where clarity and transparency could be improved to facilitate broader understanding and engagement with the public and specialized stakeholders.
Issues
• The document mentions a meeting that will be held virtually but still lists a physical address, which could cause confusion. Clarification about the need for the physical address despite the virtual format might be needed.
• The notice mentions that the meeting is closed to the public, but it does not provide a reason or context for this decision, which might be seen as lacking transparency.
• The document does not provide details about the agenda or purpose of the meeting, which might be useful for understanding the context of the meeting closure and its relevance.
• The document cites an earlier Federal Register document (FR Doc 2024-30711, 89 FR 105062) but does not summarize or explain the content, which may necessitate additional research for full context.
• Since the meeting is related to a Special Emphasis Panel and an SBIR Review Meeting, further information about the specific topics or organizations involved could be helpful for evaluating any potential bias or favoritism.