Overview
Title
In the Matter of David Huey; Order
Agencies
ELI5 AI
David Huey did something he wasn't supposed to do at work, so now he can't do similar work for three years. If he wants to work in this kind of job again, he has to tell the people in charge once the three years are up.
Summary AI
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued an order prohibiting David Huey, a former manager at Titan Inspections, Inc., from participating in NRC-licensed activities for three years. This decision was made because he instructed a radiographer to work without a second qualified person present, which violated NRC regulations. The order requires Huey to immediately cease any NRC-licensed activities and notify the NRC of any new employment in such activities after the prohibition period. Huey and anyone affected by this order have the right to request a hearing within 30 days of its publication in the Federal Register.
Abstract
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an Order prohibiting Mr. Huey, a former manager at Titan Inspections, Inc. (Titan), from participating in NRC-licensed activities for three years. This action is being taken because the NRC determined that Mr. Huey deliberately caused Titan to violate NRC requirements by directing a radiographer to perform radiography at a location within NRC jurisdiction without a second qualified individual being present. Such conduct violates NRC regulations, which prohibit any licensee or employee of a licensee from engaging in deliberate misconduct that causes or would have caused, if not detected, a licensee, to be in violation of any rule, regulation, order, or any term, condition, or limitation of any license issued by the Commission. The Order is effective upon issuance.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The document pertains to a formal order issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) against David Huey, a former manager at Titan Inspections, Inc. The NRC has barred Mr. Huey from participating in activities that fall under NRC licensing for a period of three years. This prohibition stems from an incident where Mr. Huey instructed a radiographer to conduct radiography without the presence of a second qualified individual, thereby violating NRC regulations. The order is effective immediately and outlines specific requirements Mr. Huey must follow regarding any future involvement in NRC-licensed activities.
Significant Issues or Concerns
The document uses complex legal and regulatory language, making it accessible primarily to those with specialized knowledge or experience in legal and regulatory affairs. For those without such background, understanding the full implications of the order could be challenging. The document references specific sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) without giving clear explanations, which might confound readers unfamiliar with legal citations.
Additionally, the procedure for filing electronically, acquiring necessary digital ID certificates, and navigating the NRC’s E-Filing system is presented in detail, potentially overwhelming those unaccustomed to these processes. The requirement for Mr. Huey to notify the NRC of any new employment in NRC-licensed activities after the prohibition period could benefit from further clarification on the exact process and timeframe for such notifications.
Impact on the General Public
For the general public, this document underscores the NRC's commitment to ensuring that nuclear-related activities are conducted safely and within the regulatory framework. It serves as an example of the regulatory oversight enforced to protect public health and safety. By addressing deliberate misconduct, the NRC reinforces its role in preventing potential violations that could pose risks to the community at large.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For individuals involved in the nuclear industry, especially those working in compliance or regulatory roles, this document acts as a reminder of the strict adherence to NRC regulations required in all operations. It highlights the potential consequences of non-compliance and the importance of maintaining accurate and reliable operational standards.
The decision has direct negative implications for Mr. Huey. He faces immediate restrictions on participating in his professional field for three years, which could impact his career significantly. Moreover, the conditions imposed for post-prohibition activities indicate ongoing monitoring and oversight, ensuring compliance before he can fully resume work in NRC-licensed activities.
Titan Inspections, Inc., although not directly penalized in this document, might experience reputational impacts due to their association with the violation. They will likely need to take corrective actions to ensure that all future activities strictly adhere to NRC regulations, potentially affecting their operations.
Overall, the document reaffirms the NRC's authority and the rigorous standards applied in regulating nuclear activities, emphasizing safety and compliance as paramount concerns.
Issues
• The document's language uses complex legal and regulatory terms which might be difficult for a layperson to understand, requiring specialized knowledge to fully comprehend the implications and procedures involved.
• The provision regarding electronic filing and digital ID certificates is detailed and might be overwhelming for those unfamiliar with the specific processes of the NRC's E-Filing system.
• The document heavily references various sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) without providing clear explanations or summaries, potentially leading to confusion about the specific requirements and violations.
• The process for applying for a hearing or extension is detailed but could benefit from a simplified summary or step-by-step guide for individuals who might not be familiar with legal proceedings.
• The requirement for Huey to notify the NRC of his first employment after the prohibition needs clarification on the exact timeframe and process for notification, to avoid misunderstandings.
• The document assumes a level of familiarity with the NRC and its processes that may not exist among all readers, particularly those who are not directly involved in the nuclear industry.
• The document contains a significant amount of cross-referencing (e.g., to ADAMS accession numbers and other legal documents) which might be inaccessible or difficult to navigate for some readers.