FR 2025-00528

Overview

Title

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Hanford

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board is having a meeting about cleaning up a place called Hanford. People can join the meeting either by going to the hotel in Washington or by watching it online.

Summary AI

The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management has announced a hybrid meeting of the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Hanford. It will be held both in-person and virtually on February 12 and 13, 2025, at the Holiday Inn Express in Pasco, Washington. The meeting is open to the public, and anyone interested can request virtual access or accommodations for disabilities by contacting Kelly Snyder. The agenda includes topics like cleanup priorities and updates from Tri-Party Agreement Agencies, and attendees can make oral statements by requesting in advance.

Abstract

This notice announces a hybrid meeting of the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Hanford. The Federal Advisory Committee Act requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 3199
Document #: 2025-00528
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 3199-3200

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register announces a hybrid meeting of the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board for the Hanford site, organized by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management. Scheduled for February 12 and 13, 2025, this meeting will take place both in-person in Pasco, Washington, and virtually. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss various issues related to environmental management at the Hanford site, including cleanup priorities and updates from involved agencies. The public is invited to attend, and provisions have been made to accommodate persons with disabilities.

Summary and Overview

The notice serves a dual purpose: to inform the public about the meeting and to outline procedures for participation. The meeting is described as a "hybrid," allowing both in-person and online attendance, which broadens accessibility. However, potential participants must contact the Designated Federal Officer for virtual access details, which could pose a barrier for those who do not promptly make contact or for those unfamiliar with such processes. The meeting's agenda includes significant topics like fiscal year 2027 cleanup priorities and updates from key agencies involved in the Hanford site's ongoing management.

Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from the content of this notice:

  1. Definition of "Hybrid Meeting": The term "hybrid meeting" is used without a clear explanation, which may confuse readers unfamiliar with the concept.

  2. Access Information: The requirement for participants to contact an official for virtual access details might limit the meeting's accessibility. A more straightforward online registration system could mitigate this concern.

  3. Submission of Written Statements: The process for submitting written statements to the board is not fully explained, leaving potential participants unsure about how to contribute their input.

  4. Public Comment Process: While the meeting allows public comments, it is unclear how these comments will be managed, especially if many wish to speak. The mention of a five-minute limit lacks details on its flexibility or enforcement.

  5. Modern Communication: The document relies on traditional communication methods, such as phone and email, without mention of modern, potentially more accessible, digital platforms.

Potential Impacts

Broad Public Impact

The document's announcement of a hybrid meeting format could promote broader public engagement by offering both physical and virtual attendance options. However, the requirement to request virtual access might dampen participation from those unfamiliar with such protocols or lacking internet access.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved in environmental management or living near the Hanford site, the meeting provides an important platform for engagement and input. These individuals may benefit from the chance to discuss cleanup and management priorities firsthand. However, the unclear submission process for written statements could deter some stakeholders from providing valuable input.

Conclusion

In summary, while the notice seeks to encourage public engagement in environmental management discussions, some aspects may hinder accessibility and participation. Clearer explanations of the "hybrid meeting" format and more comprehensive details on accessing the meeting—especially virtually—could enhance the document's effectiveness. Additionally, offering more modern communication options might attract a wider range of participants. For stakeholders, the meeting represents an essential opportunity to influence decisions affecting the Hanford site, yet the process for engaging needs to be more straightforward to ensure inclusive participation.

Issues

  • • The document uses the term 'hybrid meeting' without a clear explanation for lay readers unfamiliar with this concept. Consider clarifying that it means the meeting can be attended both in-person and virtually.

  • • The notice does not provide specific virtual access details, requiring attendees to contact the Designated Federal Officer. This may limit accessibility if not done promptly.

  • • The document mentions that written statements may be filed with the Board 'either before or within five business days after the meeting' but does not specify how these statements can be submitted (e.g., mail, email, online form).

  • • The phrase 'reasonable provision will be made to include the presentation in the agenda' is vague without details on what 'reasonable provision' entails.

  • • Contact details are provided for further information, but more modern communication methods or platforms (e.g., online registration for meeting access) are not mentioned, potentially limiting accessibility.

  • • The section about public comments mentions a maximum of five minutes for presentations but does not clarify whether this time limit is flexible or provide details on how comments will be managed if multiple participants wish to speak.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 697
Sentences: 31
Entities: 62

Language

Nouns: 255
Verbs: 45
Adjectives: 31
Adverbs: 9
Numbers: 32

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.11
Average Sentence Length:
22.48
Token Entropy:
5.13
Readability (ARI):
17.40

Reading Time

about 2 minutes