Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission got a note from the Gulf South Pipeline Company about changing some prices for using their pipes that carry gas, and people interested can say what they think by January 15, 2025. They can ask for help online if they're confused about how to do that.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has received filings related to rate changes for the Gulf South Pipeline Company. Two specific rate filings, RP25-342-000 and RP25-343-000, detail agreements involving parties such as Osaka and EDF, with effective dates in January 2025. Interested individuals who want to participate or protest must file their comments or interventions by January 15, 2025. Comprehensive details and filing procedures are accessible online, and the Commission's Office of Public Participation is available to assist the public.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is a notice of filings concerning rate changes proposed by the Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC. Two specific filings, identified as RP25-342-000 and RP25-343-000, involve rate agreements between the Gulf South Pipeline Company and parties such as Osaka and EDF. These agreements are set to take effect in early January 2025. The document invites public participation, allowing for comments or interventions to be submitted by January 15, 2025. It also highlights the assistance provided by FERC's Office of Public Participation for stakeholders engaging in these proceedings.
Summary of Issues
A significant issue with the document is its lack of detailed information on the nature of the rate agreements. Terms like "4(d) Rate Filing" and "Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt" are used without explanation, potentially confusing readers unfamiliar with regulatory jargon. Additionally, the document does not disclose whether these rate adjustments might lead to increased costs for consumers, information that would be essential for stakeholders to assess the impact effectively. Moreover, while the document outlines steps for intervention, it does not delve into the potential consequences of these filings, which might stifle engagement by those who are not well-versed in the procedural complexities.
Public Impact
For the general public, the document's implications remain somewhat opaque due to the absence of clear information on how these rate changes might affect natural gas prices or availability. Without acknowledging potential repercussions on consumer costs, stakeholders could find it challenging to ascertain whether their intervention or protest might be necessary or beneficial. This lack of clarity may contribute to public disengagement or discontent if consumer prices were to rise unexpectedly following these adjustments.
Stakeholder Impact
For more specific stakeholders—such as the businesses directly involved, environmental groups, or consumer advocacy organizations—the document may serve as a catalyst for action. However, those affected must understand the procedural nuances described and be prepared to navigate FERC's regulatory processes, which are not thoroughly explained in the notice. Environmental and community groups, in conjunction with the Office of Public Participation, might find opportunities to engage and influence outcomes to align with broader public interests, but they must overcome the barriers of complex regulatory language and procedures.
By addressing these concerns and improving the clarity of such notices, FERC could enhance public understanding and participation, leading to a more transparent and inclusive regulatory process. It is essential for regulatory documents, especially those affecting public utilities and resources, to be accessible and comprehensible to ensure all interested parties can adequately assess and respond to potential changes.
Issues
• The document does not provide detailed information about the nature of the rate agreements being filed, which could lead to a lack of transparency for stakeholders and the public.
• There is no indication of whether the rate filings could result in increased costs for consumers, which would be important information for public stakeholders.
• The document uses specific jargon such as '4(d) Rate Filing' and 'Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt', which may not be easily understandable to the general public without additional context or explanation.
• The document does not provide information on the potential impact of these filings on the natural gas market or on related energy consumers.
• The notice only mentions steps for intervention and does not explain the potential consequences of these filings, which may limit stakeholder understanding and engagement.
• Protests may be considered but are not guaranteed, yet there is a strong focus on the need for intervention to become a party to the proceedings, which may discourage participation by those unfamiliar with the process.