FR 2025-00416

Overview

Title

Request for Public Comments on Reports on Alcoholic Beverages and Health To Inform the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025-2030

Agencies

ELI5 AI

HHS and USDA want to hear what people think about two reports on how drinking alcohol affects health, so they can update new food rules for Americans. People have 30 days to share their thoughts online or by mail.

Summary AI

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) are asking for public feedback on two reports related to alcohol and health. These reports are intended to guide the Dietary Guidelines for Americans from 2025 to 2030. The reports, produced by the ICCPUD and NASEM, offer findings on how alcohol consumption affects health. Individuals can submit comments online or by mail until the end of the 30-day comment period.

Abstract

HHS and USDA invite the public to provide written comments on two reports: The Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Prevention of Underage Drinking (ICCPUD) Alcohol Intake and Health (AIH) draft report and The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's (NASEM) Review of Evidence on Alcohol and Health report.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 3883
Document #: 2025-00416
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 3883-3884

AnalysisAI

The document, issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, invites public commentary on two reports aimed at informing the upcoming Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025-2030. These reports, produced by distinguished agencies focusing on public health and science, examine the effects of alcohol consumption on health. As public feedback is sought, stakeholders are encouraged to review and comment on these findings.

Summary

At its core, the document seeks to engage the public in a critical evaluation process of the reports by ICCPUD and NASEM concerning alcohol intake. These scientific reviews aim to offer insights, albeit without definitive recommendations, regarding alcohol's impact on health, thus ensuring that the dietary guidelines remain informed by the latest research. The commentary period lasts for 30 days, with comments accepted via online submissions or mailed correspondence.

Issues and Concerns

A few significant issues arise from the way the document is presented:

  • Lack of Specific Dates: Despite mentioning a 30-day period for public comments, the document does not specify the exact start or closing dates for this period, leaving the public without clarity on deadlines.

  • Submission Instructions: The document directs individuals wishing to submit comments to a general website, without providing an explicit, user-friendly path, which could pose barriers for some participants.

  • Guidance Uncertainty: While requesting public input on how the reports should guide policy, the document does not specify which areas or aspects of alcohol consumption are of particular interest, potentially leading to unfocused feedback.

  • Complex Legal References: References to legal authorities, such as Public Law 101-445, are made without explanation, which may confuse those unfamiliar with these statutes.

  • Historical Context: The document notes that guidance on alcohol has been part of the guidelines since 1980, but fails to explain how the current reports expand or modify past guidance.

Public Impact

For the general public, this document represents an opportunity to influence national dietary guidelines. These guidelines have widespread effects on policy, education, and health initiatives throughout the country, impacting everything from school lunch programs to health care policies. However, the lack of clarity around commenting procedures may limit public engagement.

Stakeholder Impact

Stakeholders, including health professionals, advocacy groups, and policymakers, stand to be significantly affected by the conclusions drawn from these reports. Positive impacts could arise from more nuanced and evidence-based guidelines leading to improved public health outcomes and reduced alcohol-related harm. Conversely, should any ambiguity remain unaddressed, there is a risk that the dietary guidelines may fail to optimally reflect cutting-edge scientific insights, potentially affecting policy effectiveness.

In sum, this document forms a critical part of the engagement strategy for developing future dietary guidelines. It underscores the balance between scientific inquiry and public input in shaping health policy, though improvements in accessibility and clarity could enhance its effectiveness.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the exact closing date of the public comment period; it only mentions a 30-day period and that specific dates will be announced at a later time.

  • • The instructions for submitting comments online refer users to www.regulations.gov but do not provide a direct link or explicit step-by-step instructions, which may be confusing for some users.

  • • The notice requests comments on how the reports should be used to inform guidance on alcoholic beverage consumption, but it does not specify any particular aspects or areas of focus, which might leave respondents uncertain about what aspects to comment on.

  • • The document references certain legal authorities and acts, such as Public Law 101-445 and the National Nutrition Monitoring and Related Research Act of 1990, without explaining their relevance or implications, which could be confusing for readers unfamiliar with these laws.

  • • The document mentions 'guidance on the consumption of alcoholic beverages has been included in each edition of the Dietary Guidelines since the first edition in 1980,' but does not explain how the current reports differ or add to this ongoing guidance history.

  • • The contact information for Janet M. de Jesus provides a phone number and email but does not clarify the expected response time or primary mode of communication preferred.

  • • The document could benefit from simplifying some of the language, such as substituting or defining terms like 'comprehensive review with significant, specific expertise,' to ensure clarity for all readers.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 724
Sentences: 26
Entities: 88

Language

Nouns: 269
Verbs: 40
Adjectives: 32
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 33

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.76
Average Sentence Length:
27.85
Token Entropy:
5.05
Readability (ARI):
22.94

Reading Time

about 2 minutes