FR 2025-00382

The document is an official notice from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), specifically regarding changes in the organizational framework of its Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration (ASA). This update modifies how the office manages various administrative and business functions, impacting areas such as human resources, information technology, and acquisitions. Cheryl Campbell, the current Assistant Secretary for Administration, is leading these changes to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of HHS operations.

Summary of the Document

The main purpose of this notice is to update the organizational structure and the delegation of authority within the ASA. The document outlines the roles and responsibilities of different components within ASA, such as the Office of Human Resources, Office of Equal Employment Opportunity, and the Office of the Chief Information Officer. It also details the ASA's responsibilities as the principal advisor on business and administrative operations at HHS.

Significant Issues or Concerns

While the document aims to clarify the structure and functions of the ASA, it raises some concerns and issues that need further attention:

• Budget Allocations and Cost-Effectiveness: The document does not specify how budget allocations for each ASA component are determined, nor does it define clear measures for cost-effectiveness. This lack of detail could result in oversight or inefficient spending.

• Conflict of Interest: There is no explanation of mechanisms to prevent conflicts of interest, particularly in the Office of Acquisition Management Services. Given that this office handles acquisitions, the absence of such mechanisms might lead to potential conflicts during contractual procedures.

• Vagueness of Terms: Terms like "value-added" and "innovative mission support solutions" in the description of the Program Support Center are ambiguous. Without clear criteria or definitions, these could lead to varied interpretations and expectations regarding performance.

• Delegation of Authority: While the delegation of authority is broadly discussed, the document lacks specific procedures or criteria for its re-delegation. This could generate inconsistencies or misunderstandings concerning who holds power within various ASA components and across different HHS divisions.

• Performance Metrics: The document mentions providing "better, more efficient service" but does not articulate specific metrics or benchmarks. Such lack of defined standards makes it challenging to assess performance improvements, particularly in the realm of information and technology services.

Impact on the Public

The reorganization of the ASA impacts the public primarily through the efficiency and quality of services that the HHS provides. By potentially streamlining administrative functions and clarifying roles, the HHS aims to deliver more effective health-related services to the public. However, the ambiguity in certain areas may lead to inconsistencies in service quality or availability if not addressed.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

• HHS Employees and Divisions: For employees within HHS, particularly those in management or administrative roles, these changes could lead to shifts in responsibilities or reporting structures. Without clear guidelines and mechanisms, there could be confusion or challenges in adapting to the new structure.

• Other Federal Agencies: As the document notes, the Program Support Center provides services to other federal agencies. The changes within ASA may affect these partnerships, especially if expectations and performance metrics are not clearly defined.

• Vendors and Contractors: Changes in procedures within the Office of Acquisition Management Services could impact vendors and contractors working with HHS. Clarity in acquisition processes and conflict-of-interest measures is crucial to maintain fair and transparent business practices.

In summary, while the document articulates a vision of improved efficiency and streamlined operations within the HHS's administrative framework, further details and clarifications are necessary to ensure consistent, transparent, and effective implementation. Addressing the highlighted concerns could substantially benefit both internal stakeholders and the public by enhancing the quality and reliability of the services delivered by HHS.