FR 2025-00373

Overview

Title

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request;

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of Agriculture wants people to share their thoughts on how they plan to collect information about selling trees from forests to make sure it's done right and fair. People can say what they think until February 10, 2025, by going to a special website.

Summary AI

The Department of Agriculture has requested comments on a proposed information collection related to selling timber from national forests, as part of a submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. This process is under the Paperwork Reduction Act, and public comments can be made until February 10, 2025, through the www.reginfo.gov website. The collection aims to ensure that timber is sold at appropriate values and that bidding processes adhere to legal standards, involving respondents like businesses and individuals, with a total estimated respondent burden of 118,018 hours.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 1939
Document #: 2025-00373
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 1939-1940

AnalysisAI

The document in question is a notice from the Department of Agriculture regarding a request for comments on an upcoming information collection proposal, which aims to streamline the sale of timber from national forests. This collection is part of the Department's compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and involves submitting these requirements to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. The purpose is to ensure that the processes surrounding the sale of timber are efficient and comply with legal necessities.

General Summary

The Department of Agriculture is seeking public input on whether the proposed information collection is essential for its responsibilities, particularly around the sale of timber from national forests. It seeks commentary on the necessity, the practical utility of the information collected, and whether the methods used to estimate burdens are valid. The comment period is open until February 10, 2025, and feedback is to be submitted online.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from the document. Firstly, there is an absence of detailed explanations regarding the need for six different bid forms for timber sales and how these differ significantly. This lack of clarity can make it challenging for respondents to understand the requirements fully.

Additionally, the document lacks transparency concerning the financial implications of this collection process, leaving questions about government spending efficiency and potential biases unanswered. There is also confusion due to the absence of definitions for terms like "Uniform Commercial Code" (UCC) and "National Forest System timber," which might not be familiar to all readers.

Moreover, although the document suggests using advanced technologies to ease the burden on respondents, it doesn't specify how this will be accomplished or provide examples of technological adaptations that might be implemented.

Lastly, the document does not clarify what steps follow the comment collection phase, resulting in ambiguity about what happens after the February 10, 2025 deadline.

Broad Public Impact

For the general public, this document signifies an opportunity to influence how public resources, such as national forests, are managed. The comments received could shape the agency's policies and procedures, potentially leading to more efficient and transparent processes. This is an exercise of participatory governance where public opinion can directly impact federal operations.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, particularly businesses, individuals, and corporations interested in purchasing timber, are directly affected. The information collection process could facilitate a fairer and transparent bidding process, ensuring that timber sales are conducted legally and ethically. The stipulated method ensures that timber is sold at an appropriate value, possibly benefiting the economy by stabilizing prices.

On the downside, the lack of clarity and complexity in the required bid forms may lead to additional burdens on these stakeholders if they must navigate unclear processes or face challenges due to the lack of technological implementation descriptions.

In conclusion, while the proposed information collection has the potential for positive outcomes through improved governance in the sale of national resources, the highlighted areas of concern need addressing to make the process more inclusive and efficient for all involved stakeholders. Public participation in the ongoing comment period is crucial for conveying these concerns and fostering better policy development.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide information regarding the actual cost or financial implication of the information collection process, making it difficult to assess for wasteful spending or favoritism.

  • • The utility and necessity of the specific bid forms (six versions) used in the information collection are not clearly justified. There is no explanation as to why different forms are necessary and how they significantly differ from one another.

  • • The terms 'OCC', 'Uniform Commercial Code', and 'National Forest System timber' are used without definitions or explanations, which may lead to confusion for readers unfamiliar with these terms.

  • • The document does not specify any measures or examples of how the Forest Service intends to use automated, electronic, or other technological means to minimize the burden on respondents, despite mentioning it as a consideration.

  • • The text does not clearly outline the timeframe between the submission of comments and the next steps in the review process, leading to potential ambiguity about what happens after the February 10, 2025 deadline for comments.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 686
Sentences: 24
Entities: 32

Language

Nouns: 222
Verbs: 67
Adjectives: 32
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 25

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.36
Average Sentence Length:
28.58
Token Entropy:
5.11
Readability (ARI):
21.88

Reading Time

about 2 minutes