Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The government wants to make some changes to the rules about how much it costs to use certain gas pipelines, and they want to hear if people like the changes or not by the middle of January. If someone needs help to understand or talk about it, there's a special group ready to help them out.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission received several filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refund reports. These filings involve companies like NEXUS Gas Transmission, Rockies Express Pipeline, and others, proposing new rate agreements and changes to take effect either in January or February 2025. Interested parties must submit their comments or interventions by January 14 or 15, 2025. The filings can be accessed online, and FERC’s Office of Public Participation is available to assist the public with inquiries and participation in these proceedings.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document from the Federal Register, under citation "90 FR 1995" and document number "2025-00355," provides a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) about certain filings related to natural gas pipeline rates. These filings, submitted by various pipeline companies, propose negotiated rate agreements and amendments that are intended to take effect in early 2025. The notice outlines the specifics of these filings, including docket and accession numbers, the names of the applicants such as NEXUS Gas Transmission and Rockies Express Pipeline, as well as the proposed effective dates.
General Summary
The document serves as an official notification regarding a series of rate filings submitted to FERC. Each filing pertains to changes in the negotiated rates between pipeline companies and their clients. The notice includes essential details, such as the dates for submitting comments or interventions, which are crucial for stakeholders who wish to express opinions or objections concerning the proposed changes. The filings have been made accessible through FERC's eLibrary system, and the Office of Public Participation is available to assist the public in navigating these proceedings.
Significant Issues or Concerns
One of the primary concerns with the document is the complex and technical language used throughout, which may not be easily understood by those outside the legal or energy sectors. Terms like "4(d) Rate Filing" and "Negotiated Rates" are not defined within the document, potentially causing confusion for the layperson.
Additionally, the repeated use of docket numbers and accession numbers, without providing context or explanations, might be overwhelming and obscure. This complexity may hinder public engagement and participation, especially for those unfamiliar with FERC's processes.
The document also lacks an abstract or a comprehensive summary to aid readers in understanding its overall context quickly. Without an explanation of the rationale behind the rate changes, there may be perceived transparency issues regarding how these filings impact stakeholders.
Public Impact
The document's content could affect the public predominantly through changes in natural gas prices. Families and businesses that rely on natural gas for their energy needs might see shifts in their utility bills depending on how these negotiated rates influence supply contracts and distribution costs.
Moreover, those living in areas serviced by the pipeline companies involved might need to understand how these filings could alter service agreements or pricing structures. Broadly, there is a need for the public to be informed about such changes to budget accordingly.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders directly involved, such as gas distributors and energy marketers, these changes present both opportunities and challenges. New rate agreements can lead to more favorable terms for suppliers or customers, depending on negotiations' outcomes. However, there could be negative impacts if parties find the new rates unsustainable or if competition dynamics shift unfavorably.
Entities considering interventions or protests must promptly submit their documentation by the specified deadlines. The necessity to familiarize themselves with the regulations governing such submissions (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214, or 385.206) implies that only those with significant legal expertise or resources may effectively participate in this procedure.
In summary, while this document provides important regulatory information, its dense presentation might limit public engagement unless more accessible resolutions, support, or explanations are provided.
Issues
• The document contains complex legal and regulatory language which may be difficult for non-experts to understand, potentially limiting public participation.
• The use of docket numbers and accession numbers without context could be confusing to readers unfamiliar with the filing process.
• There is no linked or referenced abstract to provide a summary of the document's content, which may aid in comprehension for casual readers.
• The document includes technical terms such as '4(d) Rate Filing' and 'Negotiated Rates' without definitions, possibly leading to confusion among laypersons.
• There is no explicit explanation of the rationale behind the rate filings or the impact they might have on stakeholders, which could be perceived as lacking transparency.
• The document assumes familiarity with Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214, or 385.206) without providing detailed guidance, which might be challenging for newcomers to the process.