FR 2025-00310

Overview

Title

Request for Nominations for Voting Members on a Public Advisory Committee; Technical Electronic Product Radiation Safety Standards Committee

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The FDA wants to find people to help them make sure electronic products, like X-ray machines, are safe. They're looking for different kinds of people to join their team, and they want to hear from all sorts of folks to keep their team diverse and fair.

Summary AI

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is looking for nominations to fill positions on the Technical Electronic Product Radiation Safety Standards Committee (TEPRSSC). This committee advises on safety standards for electronic product radiation. Nominations are open for 15 voting members, including a Chair, chosen based on expertise in science or engineering relevant to radiation safety. The FDA encourages a diverse range of nominees from different backgrounds and emphasizes inclusion.

Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting nominations for voting members to serve on the Technical Electronic Product Radiation Safety Standards Committee (TEPRSSC) in the Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Nominations will be accepted for current and upcoming vacancies effective January 1, 2025, with this notice. FDA seeks to include the views of women and men, members of all racial and ethnic groups, and individuals with and without disabilities on its advisory committees and, therefore, encourages nominations of appropriately qualified candidates from these groups.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 2009
Document #: 2025-00310
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 2009-2010

AnalysisAI

The document under review is a notice from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), published in the Federal Register, soliciting nominations for voting members to join the Technical Electronic Product Radiation Safety Standards Committee (TEPRSSC). This committee plays a crucial advisory role, providing expert advice and consultation to the FDA regarding safety standards for electronic products that emit radiation. Nominations are being accepted for terms beginning January 1, 2025.

Summary of the Document

The FDA is looking for 15 voting members to comprise the TEPRSSC, which includes a Chair. Members are selected based on their knowledge and expertise in the scientific or engineering fields relevant to radiation safety. The FDA is particularly committed to promoting diversity among its committee members and encourages nominations from women, men, individuals from various racial and ethnic backgrounds, and those with disabilities. Submissions are open until March 11, 2025, to ensure consideration for upcoming vacancies.

Significant Issues or Concerns

Several concerns arise from the document’s content and scope.

  • Ambiguity in Nomination Criteria: The notice lacks specific details regarding the qualifications or criteria required for nominees. This omission could lead to confusion and potentially hinder qualified candidates from applying if they are unsure of the expectations or qualifications needed.

  • Conflicts of Interest: While it is mentioned that nominees must disclose information regarding financial holdings and other potential conflicts of interest, the lack of a detailed explanation creates an uncertainty about what specific information needs to be provided or investigated.

  • Committee Renewal Process: The document briefly notes that terms beyond two years are contingent upon committee renewal but falls short of explaining how this process works or the criteria for deciding on the committee’s renewal.

  • Technical Language: The notice includes terms such as “technical feasibility, reasonableness, and practicability,” which may be difficult for potential nominees unfamiliar with regulatory language to fully comprehend.

  • Roles and Responsibilities: A more comprehensive explanation of what the roles and responsibilities entail for the committee’s members could provide clearer guidance for prospective applicants.

  • Diversity Strategy: Although diversity is highlighted as a goal, the notice does not lay out any specific strategies or outreach efforts to actively achieve this diversity, potentially limiting the representation it aims to enhance.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

The notice has broad implications for the public, especially considering electronic product radiation's impact on safety and health. By seeking scientific and engineering experts, the FDA ensures that the standards developed are based on sound knowledge. This approach maintains public trust in the safety of electronic products.

For specific stakeholders like potential nominees, electronics manufacturers, and public health officials, the document’s solicitation represents an opportunity to shape important safety standards. However, the lack of clarity on nomination criteria and committee operations could deter some qualified candidates who might otherwise have contributed significantly.

The emphasis on diversity among nominees signifies a positive aim to include a wide range of perspectives and experiences. Achieving this could lead to more robust and inclusive safety standards that better reflect the diverse makeup of society.

In conclusion, while the notice is a crucial step in safeguarding public health regarding electronic radiation safety, addressing its ambiguities and clarifying its processes could enhance the nomination process and ensure a more effective and representative committee.

Issues

  • • The notice does not provide specific criteria or qualifications required for nominees, which could lead to ambiguity in the nomination process.

  • • There is no detailed explanation of the potential conflicts of interest that need to be disclosed, creating uncertainty about what is required from nominees.

  • • The document mentions that terms longer than two years are contingent upon committee renewal, but does not explain the process or criteria for such renewal.

  • • The document uses technical language such as 'technical feasibility, reasonableness, and practicability,' which may not be easily understood by all potential nominees not familiar with the specific regulatory context.

  • • The document might benefit from a more in-depth explanation of the roles and responsibilities of TEPRSSC members to provide clearer guidance for prospective nominees.

  • • The notice encourages diversity in nominations but does not specify any strategies or outreach efforts to achieve this diversity.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 723
Sentences: 27
Entities: 70

Language

Nouns: 263
Verbs: 46
Adjectives: 38
Adverbs: 9
Numbers: 39

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.35
Average Sentence Length:
26.78
Token Entropy:
5.19
Readability (ARI):
20.70

Reading Time

about 2 minutes