Overview
Title
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Department of Defense wants to collect info about kids' behavior on military bases to help keep them safe and support their families, and they are asking people to share their thoughts on this idea by February 10, 2025.
Summary AI
The Department of Defense (DoD) has sent a proposal to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to gather information under the Paperwork Reduction Act. This proposal aims to collect data on problematic sexual behavior among children and youth on military bases. The information will help develop safety plans and support services for affected families. Public comments on this proposal need to be submitted by February 10, 2025.
Abstract
The DoD has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document in question is a notice from the Department of Defense (DoD) regarding its submission of a proposal to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The goal is to gather information under the Paperwork Reduction Act concerning problematic sexual behavior among children and youth on military bases. This initiative arises from the requirements laid out in the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, which calls for a structured response to juvenile-on-juvenile problematic sexual behavior on military installations.
General Overview
The notice outlines the DoD’s request to collect data, which will be utilized to develop safety plans, support services, and intervention strategies for families impacted by problematic sexual behavior in children and youth (PSB-CY) on military installations. Public comments on this proposal are invited, with a submission deadline of February 10, 2025. The information is collected to establish eligibility for Family Advocacy Program (FAP) services and to form case records.
Significant Issues or Concerns
The document, although detailed, might present some challenges for laypersons in understanding certain terminologies, such as "Problematic Sexual Behavior in Children and Youth Information System" and "Family Advocacy Program (FAP)." These terms are critical to comprehending the document’s intent and scope but could benefit from simplified explanations. Furthermore, while the process mentions a "multidisciplinary response" and "evidence-informed support," these processes could be elaborated further for a clearer understanding. Another notable absence is a comprehensive connection between the data collection and how it aligns with statutory requirements, or its benefits to the involved parties. Moreover, the document outlines the time burden on respondents but lacks details on the potential financial implications of this data collection effort, which might be relevant for evaluating any unnecessary expenses.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this initiative could enhance the safety and well-being of children and youth on military installations by ensuring they receive appropriate support and interventions. This could foster a safer environment overall, as policies and services are tailored to the nuanced needs of affected families. On the other hand, individuals or households required to respond may encounter an additional burden, albeit on a voluntary basis, due to the time and effort involved in completing the related processes.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders such as military families, this proposal holds the promise of better and more coordinated support systems for those dealing with PSB-CY. The implementation of structured safety plans and tailored intervention services could positively impact families undergoing these challenging circumstances. However, the effectiveness and reach of such initiatives would heavily depend on how well the data is collected and used to inform policy and service development. There is concern that without a clear understanding of the processes or adequate resources, some families might not benefit as expected. Moreover, the DoD must balance the benefits of data collection with the need to respect the privacy and autonomy of participating families, ensuring no undue burden is imposed on them.
In summary, the document outlines a potentially positive step towards addressing a significant issue within military communities. However, clarity in communication and prudence in execution will be essential to ensuring its success and acceptance by the intended stakeholders.
Issues
• The document may be unclear to laypersons who are not familiar with the terms used, such as 'Problematic Sexual Behavior in Children and Youth Information System' and 'Family Advocacy Program (FAP)'. Further explanation or simplification of these terms might be helpful.
• The purpose and processes associated with the 'multidisciplinary response' and 'evidence informed support and intervention services' could be elaborated on for greater clarity.
• While the document mentions the legal framework and statutory requirements, it might benefit from a more explicit connection between the specific data being collected and how it directly supports the statutory requirements or benefits the involved parties.
• Although the document specifies the number of respondents and annual burden, it does not provide specific information on the estimated cost associated with this collection, which could be important for understanding potential wasteful spending.