FR 2025-00283

Overview

Title

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Navy wants to ask some of its members questions to find out if problems like not having enough money or feeling left out make them feel sadder or more upset. They hope to use this information to help make things better for these people.

Summary AI

The Department of Defense (DoD), specifically the Department of the Navy, has submitted a proposal to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) aimed at understanding the impact of social factors on the behavior and mental health of military personnel. This study will collect data from service members to examine how issues like financial problems, housing insecurity, and discrimination contribute to mental health challenges and suicide risks. The goal is to create strategies to connect Sailors and Marines with supportive services that can address these challenges. Public comments on the proposed information collection are welcome until February 10, 2025.

Abstract

The DoD has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 1990
Document #: 2025-00283
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 1990-1991

AnalysisAI

The Department of Defense (DoD), represented by the Navy Department, has submitted a proposal to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This initiative aims to study the impact of various social factors on the mental health and behavior of military personnel, specifically targeting Sailors and Marines. The study seeks to understand how challenges such as financial and housing insecurity, social isolation, racism, and discrimination affect mental health and suicide risk. Through this survey, the DoD hopes to develop effective strategies for connecting service members with appropriate support services based on their needs. The proposal is open for public comment until February 10, 2025, offering an opportunity for the community to voice their opinions or concerns regarding the study.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The document raises several notable issues that warrant attention. Firstly, it discusses the development and administration of assessments to evaluate upstream risk factors. However, it does not provide detailed information on how these assessments will be funded or the exact scope of the study. This lack of detail may lead to ambiguity regarding the resources required for the study.

Moreover, while the document provides a broad outline of the "Needs and Uses" of the information collected, it lacks specific plans on how these findings will be implemented within the department. This vagueness may cause uncertainty about the survey's potential effectiveness and its long-term benefits to the service members.

The survey is described as voluntary, but the document does not make it clear how participants will be recruited or incentified to participate. This could raise questions about whether the study will manage to gather sufficient, diverse, and meaningful data to draw substantial conclusions.

Additionally, the text of the document uses terms like "social determinants of health (SDOH)" and "upstream risk factors" that may not be familiar to all readers. Without further explanation, these terms could be confusing for some, potentially limiting the broader public's understanding of the study's aims and importance.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, this document reflects the DoD's commitment to addressing mental health and behavioral concerns among military personnel by identifying underlying social risk factors. By inviting public comments, the DoD opens the discussion to wider community engagement, ensuring transparency and allowing stakeholders to express their views on the proposal's potential impacts.

For the military community, especially Sailors and Marines, the study may have significant positive outcomes. By offering insights into the root causes of mental health issues, the findings could lead to more targeted and effective support services, improving the quality of life for those affected.

However, for military personnel, particularly those at the non-commissioned level, there might be concerns about privacy and the implications of reporting sensitive information. It is crucial for the DoD to reassure participants about the confidentiality of their responses to encourage genuine and uninhibited participation.

For policymakers and military leadership, the results of this research could inform future policies aimed at enhancing support systems for military personnel. By understanding the social factors influencing mental health, leaders can devise strategic initiatives that promote healthier and more sustainable environments for service members. On the downside, if the study's findings are vague or poorly communicated, they may fail to effect tangible change or policy shifts.

Ultimately, the document outlines an important effort by the DoD to investigate and address the social challenges faced by its personnel. However, clear communication, defined resource allocation, and active participant engagement will be crucial for the study to achieve its anticipated benefits.

Issues

  • • The document mentions the development and administration of a comprehensive assessment of upstream risk factors, but it does not specify how these assessments will be funded or the exact scope of the study, leaving potential ambiguity regarding resource allocation.

  • • The description of 'The Needs and Uses' section is somewhat high-level and lacks specific details on how the survey results will be utilized within the department, which could lead to concerns about its effectiveness.

  • • The document states that the respondent's obligation is 'Voluntary', but it may be unclear to some audiences how participants are recruited or incentivized to ensure enough data collection.

  • • The document uses some terms such as 'social determinants of health (SDOH)' and 'upstream risk factors' which may not be easily understood by all readers without further context or definitions provided.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 561
Sentences: 33
Entities: 46

Language

Nouns: 199
Verbs: 24
Adjectives: 27
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 33

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.88
Average Sentence Length:
17.00
Token Entropy:
4.89
Readability (ARI):
17.70

Reading Time

about 2 minutes