Overview
Title
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; 2026 Census Test-Peak Data Collection
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Department of Commerce wants to test how they will count people for the 2030 Census by trying different ways to ask people questions in 2026, like using the internet. They are asking people to share their thoughts to help make the counting easier and fairer for everyone.
Summary AI
The Department of Commerce has announced a plan for public feedback on its proposed information collection activities related to the 2026 Census Test. This notice seeks comments from the public and federal agencies to help reduce the burden of data collection and improve methods, particularly for hard-to-count populations. The test will use various methods such as internet self-response and mobile questionnaire assistance, and it will take place in six locations across the United States. The main objectives are to refine data collection processes and ensure the accuracy and efficiency of the 2030 Census.
Abstract
The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment on the proposed new information collection, for the 2026 Census Test, prior to the submission of the information collection request (ICR) to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The Federal Register document shared for public comment outlines a proposal by the Department of Commerce, specifically the U.S. Census Bureau, to conduct a 2026 Census Test. This effort seeks public and federal input to optimize information collection techniques for the upcoming 2030 Census. The purpose of the test is to reduce the burden of data collection on the public and improve methods for more accurate and inclusive outcomes.
General Summary
The document details the preparation for the 2026 Census Test, which forms part of the groundwork for the 2030 Census. The test emphasizes novel approaches to reach and count populations effectively, particularly those historically recognized as "hard-to-count." Key methods include internet self-response, mobile questionnaire assistance, telephone support, and in-person enumeration, which offer various ways to encourage participation and ensure comprehensive data collection.
Significant Issues or Concerns
While the document provides an exhaustive description of the methods and goals of the census test, there are several notable concerns:
Technical Language: The document employs jargon and technical terms specific to census operations, which could be difficult for the average reader to understand without additional context or explanation.
Lack of Detail on Calculation: Estimates of the number of respondents and the time each response takes are provided, but the document does not adequately explain how these figures were derived. This lack of transparency might create skepticism about the reliability of the estimates.
Cost Analysis: There is scant mention of the financial implications or potential cost-saving strategies related to the new methods being tested, leaving unanswered questions about the efficient use of taxpayer money.
Complex Logistics: Detailed descriptions of various census operations, such as Mobile Questionnaire Assistance (MQA) and Group Quarters Enumeration (GQE), may seem excessively complex, potentially leading to concerns over resource allocation and operational efficiency.
Considerations for Bias and Inclusivity: Although the document emphasizes reaching "hard-to-count" populations, it lacks explicit discussion on addressing potential biases or ensuring inclusivity for marginalized communities, which could be a critical point of feedback.
Impact on the Public
The 2026 Census Test will likely have broad implications for the general public. By refining and improving data collection techniques, the census aims to reduce the burden on citizens in terms of time spent responding. Successful implementation could lead to more accurate representation and fair distribution of government resources. However, the test also raises concerns about privacy, use of personal data, and potential for errors in enumeration that could affect public trust.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Certain stakeholders stand to be significantly impacted by this census test:
Individuals and Households: As primary data providers, individuals will directly experience the benefits or burdens of refined census procedures. Simplified and secure methods could enhance participation, but there may be concerns over data privacy and accessibility for non-tech-savvy citizens.
Community Organizations: These groups may find opportunities to collaborate with the Census Bureau, especially to support outreach for hard-to-count populations. However, they may also face challenges in adapting to new methods or explaining complex procedures to their communities.
Government Agencies: The outcome of the 2026 Census Test could shape methodologies for the 2030 Census, impacting resource allocation and legislative representation depending on the accuracy of the final data.
Overall, while the 2026 Census Test aims to improve data collection, the document highlights areas that require further clarification and mitigation strategies to ensure the process is efficient, inclusive, and sensitive to the public's concerns about data security and privacy.
Issues
• The document uses technical and census-specific terminology that might be difficult for the general public to understand without additional context or explanation.
• The estimated number of respondents and the time per response are provided, but there is no breakdown of how these figures were calculated, which could raise questions regarding the accuracy and efficiency of these estimates.
• The document mentions various technological and field methods but does not provide detailed cost analysis or potential cost-saving measures, leaving it unclear whether there might be excessive spending in certain areas.
• The description of different census operations and tests, such as Mobile Questionnaire Assistance (MQA) and Group Quarters Enumeration (GQE), involves complex logistics which may receive criticism for potentially leading to inefficient allocation of resources or unnecessary complexity.
• There is no mention of potential unintended biases or considerations for marginalized communities beyond the reference to 'hard-to-count' populations, which may be a concern for inclusivity and fairness.