Overview
Title
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC; Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization and Establishing Intervention and Protest Deadline
Agencies
ELI5 AI
Florida Gas Transmission Company wants to stop using part of a gas pipeline in Florida, but they will keep the land ready if they need it in the future. People can say what they think about this plan by March 3, 2025.
Summary AI
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has filed a request with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to abandon a section of the Panama City Lateral pipeline in Bay County, Florida. The pipeline section, approximately 8.4 miles in length, will be abandoned in place, but the rights-of-way will be maintained for future use. The public can participate in the review process by filing protests, motions to intervene, or comments by March 3, 2025. Detailed instructions on how to file these documents are available on FERC's website, and electronic submissions are encouraged.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regarding a request by Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) to abandon in place a section of the Panama City Lateral pipeline in Bay County, Florida. This section of the pipeline is approximately 8.4 miles long. While the pipeline will be abandoned, FGT asserts it will maintain control over the land rights for potential future use. Public involvement is encouraged, as those with interest or concern about the project can file protests, motions to intervene, or comments by March 3, 2025.
Summary of the Document
In essence, the notice is about FGT's intent to cease using a part of its pipeline but retain the option to repurpose the land associated with it in the future. The mechanism for public engagement involves a structured process with specific instructions primarily found on FERC's website.
Issues and Concerns
One significant limitation of the document is the absence of details regarding any potential financial impact, such as costs associated with the pipeline's abandonment or future maintenance of the rights-of-way. This lack of financial transparency leaves questions about economic consequences unanswered.
The text of the notice is replete with technical jargon and references to U.S. regulatory codes, which might challenge comprehension by individuals without specialized legal or regulatory knowledge. This complexity could potentially deter effective public participation or submission of informed feedback.
The document also attempts to cover multiple areas, such as how to file protests, motions, and comments, which can overload the reader with information. A more concise presentation could improve understanding.
Impact on the Public
The potential closure of the pipeline section could have varying implications for the local community and stakeholders. The general public, particularly those near the affected area, may be concerned about environmental impacts as well as changes in local energy distribution that could result from this abandonment.
The extensive coverage of public participation methods indicates the importance FERC places on community involvement. However, the complexity and length of participation instructions may create barriers for average citizens to engage meaningfully in the process.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For residents and landowners in Bay County, Florida, the primary concern lies in the pipeline’s effect on property values and local environmental safety. They may also be interested in what future uses FGT might contemplate for the land associated with the abandoned pipeline.
For regulatory and environmental groups, the concern could be about ensuring that FGT responsibly handles the abandonment process in a way that protects the environment and adheres strictly to safety regulations.
Lastly, stakeholders including businesses tied to the pipeline's operation may be impacted economically. Shifts in pipeline infrastructure could influence local business dynamics and broader market conditions.
Organizing and presenting the notice with clearer segmentation of its complex aspects, such as public participation processes and technical descriptions, could greatly benefit all stakeholders involved.
Issues
• The document does not provide specific details about the cost implications of the project, making it difficult to assess if there is wasteful spending or spending favoring particular organizations.
• The language used in the document is quite technical and may be difficult for the average reader to understand without a legal or regulatory background. Terms like 'blanket certificate', 'abandon in-place', and specific CFR references could be clarified.
• The process for public participation is detailed, but could be overwhelming due to the inclusion of multiple sections such as protests, interventions, and comments. A more concise summary might improve clarity.
• Contact information is provided multiple times, which contributes to document length and could be streamlined.
• There are multiple ways to file submissions, but the explanations and instructions are spread across different sections, potentially leading to confusion. Consolidating this information might enhance comprehension.