FR 2025-00217

Overview

Title

30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Application for the Community Development Block Grant (ICDBG) Program for Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Villages; Correction; OMB Control No.: 2577-0191

Agencies

ELI5 AI

HUD made a tiny mistake in a previous announcement and fixed it, so now the title is correct. If anyone has questions, they can ask Anna Guido at HUD, and there are ways to communicate if you need help because of a disability.

Summary AI

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued a notice to correct a previous notice published in the Federal Register on December 26, 2024. The correction changes the heading to "30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection." For more details, individuals can contact Anna Guido, the HUD Clearance Officer, via email or telephone. HUD also provides resources for accessible telephone communication through its website.

Abstract

HUD is publishing this notice to correct the heading on the notice that was published in the Federal Register on December 26, 2024. The heading should read 30-day Notice of Proposed Information Collection.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 1536
Document #: 2025-00217
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 1536-1537

AnalysisAI

The document published by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is a notice of correction related to a previously issued announcement in the Federal Register. Originally published on December 26, 2024, the announcement contained a heading that needed to be corrected. The revised heading now reads "30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection." This correction pertains to the Community Development Block Grant Program for Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Villages, overseen by HUD.

General Summary

The notice is intended as a public correction to ensure clarity and accuracy within HUD's administrative communications. The Federal Register is a formal publication used by the U.S. government to keep the public informed about various activities, including proposed rules and public notices. Changes like this are routine but crucial for maintaining transparency and precision in governmental processes.

Significant Issues or Concerns

While the document is primarily procedural, it does hint at some underlying complexities. The language of the federal register is geared toward specificity and precision, often employing technical terms such as "30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection," which may not be immediately understandable to those outside the government or legal fields. This can be a barrier for public engagement and comprehension.

Additionally, when such corrections are made, questions might arise about how such errors impact the procedural integrity and whether there are broader implications. However, the document does not indicate any substantial errors beyond the incorrect heading.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this correction is likely to have minimal direct impact. It serves as a reminder of how governmental processes are both intricate and interconnected, ensuring that even minor textual errors are rectified to maintain clarity and accountability.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, including Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Villages, are more directly affected by these documents, as they pertain to grant programs that can have substantial economic and developmental impacts on their communities. Correcting the notice heading ensures that these stakeholders are clear about the procedures and timelines associated with the grant application process.

While the primary audience for this notice is likely those who are directly involved in managing and applying for the grant, the inclusion of easily accessible contact information is crucial. It facilitates communication with HUD for clarifications or assistance, thereby supporting those who might be affected by potential changes to the grant application or reporting processes.

In conclusion, while the procedural nature of the notice might make it seem unremarkable to the layperson, it underscores the importance of precision in public administration and the ongoing efforts by HUD to ensure accuracy and transparency in its communications.

Issues

  • • The document is largely procedural and does not directly discuss spending. Therefore, there are no immediate concerns about wasteful spending or favoritism based on the content provided.

  • • The correction notice seems straightforward and not ambiguous; however, some terminologies such as '30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection' and references to Federal Register citations may not be easily understood by the general public without prior knowledge of government processes.

  • • The contact information is clear, but the note on accessibility could be simplified for clarity. While it mentions how HUD supports communication with individuals who have disabilities, referring people to a webpage for more details might be perceived as an additional step.

  • • Overall, the text could be seen as complex to those unfamiliar with the Federal Register's typical document structure, but it does maintain the formal tone expected in legal notices.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 277
Sentences: 12
Entities: 33

Language

Nouns: 102
Verbs: 16
Adjectives: 9
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 20

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.39
Average Sentence Length:
23.08
Token Entropy:
4.79
Readability (ARI):
18.58

Reading Time

about a minute or two