FR 2025-00158

Overview

Title

Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Assessment on the Effects of Issuing Incidental Take Permit No. 27490

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government is thinking about letting a school catch some special sea turtles and fish by accident while they study the ocean, and they are asking people what they think about this plan.

Summary AI

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has released a Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) evaluating the impact of granting an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) to the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth School for Marine Science and Technology. This permit would allow the incidental capture of endangered species like sea turtles and sturgeon during fisheries surveys in the Massachusetts/Rhode Island Wind Energy Area. The draft is available for public comment until February 7, 2025. The evaluation considers two options: not issuing the permit or issuing it with specific conditions to minimize harm to the species.

Abstract

NMFS announces the availability of the Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) on the effects of issuing an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) (No. 27490) to the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth School for Marine Science and Technology (SMAST), pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended, for the incidental take of ESA- listed sea turtles and sturgeon associated with the otherwise lawful fisheries survey activities within and adjacent to the Massachusetts/ Rhode Island Wind Energy Area. The duration of the requested permit is 10 years. NMFS is requesting comment on the draft EA.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 1448
Document #: 2025-00158
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 1448-1449

AnalysisAI

The Federal Register document announces the availability of a Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for public review and comment. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), a division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), is considering issuing an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) to the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth's School for Marine Science and Technology. This permit would sanction the unintentional capture or disturbance of endangered sea turtles and sturgeon during fisheries surveys—a critical consideration given the project's location within the Massachusetts/Rhode Island Wind Energy Area. Public commentary is invited until February 7, 2025, enabling stakeholders to express their views on the potential consequences of either issuing or denying the permit.

General Summary

The document communicates the intent to grant a permit under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for incidental harm to protected species resulting from lawful activities. Two possible courses of action are under consideration: not granting the permit (with likely modifications to the survey practices) or issuing it with mandated conservation measures to minimize harm. The inclusion of detailed guidance on how to access further information and submit opinions underscores the commitment to stakeholder engagement.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A key concern highlighted in the document is the potential ambiguity around the term "incidental take," which may not be immediately clear to a general audience. Though it is partially defined in the text, some readers might still find the technical language challenging. Additionally, the notice relies heavily on external documents for comprehensive understanding, possibly presenting a barrier to some who seek to grasp the full scope of the issue without extensive external research.

The document outlines specific regulatory language from both the ESA and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which could be overwhelming for individuals without a regulatory background. Moreover, while the notice explores potential impacts of issuing the permit, it doesn't explicitly describe the consequences of not granting it, particularly concerning the environment or socio-economics. Such discussions might aid in deepening public understanding of the broader implications.

Impact on the Public

The public at large may find that the draft EA raises awareness about endangered species and the regulatory complexities involved in protecting them during industrial activities. By inviting public commentary, the NMFS is engaging citizens in the decision-making process, potentially increasing transparency and accountability.

If the permit is approved, individuals concerned about environmental conservation might worry about the risk to endangered species during industrial activities. Conversely, a decision not to issue the permit could affect local economic activities related to energy production and fisheries, possibly impacting jobs and regional development initiatives.

Stakeholder Impact

Stakeholders directly involved in marine science, energy projects, and environmental advocacy have vested interests in the outcomes of this process. For the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, receiving the permit could bolster its research capabilities while ensuring compliance with conservation priorities. For conservationists, however, the goal may be minimizing any adverse impacts on endangered species, which could argue against the issuance of the permit regardless of the implementation of a conservation plan.

Overall, this document emphasizes a careful balancing act between ecological stewardship and enabling human endeavors, urging thoughtful consideration and input from all interested parties.

Issues

  • • The document does not detail any specific financial implications, making it difficult to evaluate potential wasteful spending or favoritism towards particular organizations or individuals.

  • • The term 'incidental take' could be unclear to readers not familiar with ESA terminology, but is defined partially in the text.

  • • The document uses specialized regulatory language (e.g., specific references to sections of ESA and NEPA), which might be difficult for general public understanding.

  • • There's no direct mention of the potential environmental or socio-economic impacts of not issuing the permit, which could provide a more comprehensive understanding for the public.

  • • There is a heavy reliance on external documents and links for additional information, which might be inaccessible or inconvenient for readers looking for all necessary information within the notice itself.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,607
Sentences: 50
Entities: 143

Language

Nouns: 547
Verbs: 136
Adjectives: 76
Adverbs: 14
Numbers: 69

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.10
Average Sentence Length:
32.14
Token Entropy:
5.37
Readability (ARI):
22.28

Reading Time

about 6 minutes