FR 2025-00109

Overview

Title

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; Notice of Closed Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders is having a secret meeting on February 14, 2025, to talk about special voice and language projects that need money, and they can't let people watch because they need to keep important information private.

Summary AI

The National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders has announced a closed meeting scheduled for February 14, 2025. This meeting will review and evaluate grant applications focusing on voice, speech, and language. Due to the sensitive nature of the discussions, which could involve confidential trade secrets or personal information, the meeting will not be open to the public. It will take place virtually, with Sonia Elena Nanescu serving as the Scientific Review Officer.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 1179
Document #: 2025-00109
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 1179-1179

AnalysisAI

The Federal Register notice pertains to a closed meeting being held by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD). Scheduled for February 14, 2025, the gathering is intended to review and evaluate grant applications related to voice, speech, and language. The meeting will be conducted virtually and overseen by Scientific Review Officer Sonia Elena Nanescu. It is important to note that, consistent with federal regulations, the meeting will not be open to the public due to the sensitive nature of the discussions, which may reveal confidential trade secrets or private personal information.

General Summary

The document serves as a formal notification regarding an upcoming closed meeting. The purpose of the meeting is to evaluate grant applications submitted to NIDCD, focusing on areas such as voice, speech, and language. The meeting is conducted in a virtual format, allowing the participation of committee members remotely. The document provides essential information about the meeting, including the time, date, and contact details for inquiries.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the primary concerns is the lack of detailed justification for the meeting's closure to the public. The document cites general provisions concerning confidential information but does not provide a specific explanation for each legal reference. This might leave the public lacking clarity on why the meeting cannot accommodate observers.

Another issue is the limited information about the specific agenda items. While the general topic of grant evaluation is outlined, the importance and potential impact of these evaluations are not discussed. This lack of detail can contribute to a sense of opaqueness for those not directly involved.

Public Impact

For the general public, the main impact of this document lies in its implication that certain information cannot be freely accessed due to its confidential nature. While individuals interested in the workings of the NIDCD might find the content of this meeting relevant, the closure implies restricted transparency, potentially leaving those with an interest in the outcomes without substantial insights.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved in the grant applications, such as applicants, researchers, and associated institutions, the meeting is crucial. It represents a critical step in the funding process, capable of influencing future research and development in communicative disorders. However, the closed nature of the meeting means these stakeholders might not have direct access to deliberations, potentially creating a barrier to understanding how decisions are made.

Overall, while the document communicates essential details about the meeting, it raises questions about transparency and how open such processes are to public scrutiny. Stakeholders affected by the outcomes of these meetings may need to rely on post-meeting disclosures from NIDCD or follow up with the provided contact to seek further information.

Issues

  • • The meeting notice is for a closed meeting. It does not specify any public justification beyond general clauses about confidential information which might not be adequate for complete transparency.

  • • The document does not provide details on why each specific section of the law is being invoked to close the meeting to the public, which could be helpful for public understanding.

  • • The name of the committee and its focus is listed, but there is no additional context or detail regarding the actual agenda items or the significance of these reviews, making it difficult to assess the potential impact or importance of the meeting.

  • • The contact information for the Scientific Review Officer is provided, but further guidance on how outsiders might seek more information or contest the closing of the meeting, if they have concerns, is not included.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 307
Sentences: 14
Entities: 39

Language

Nouns: 118
Verbs: 15
Adjectives: 9
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 27

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.50
Average Sentence Length:
21.93
Token Entropy:
4.71
Readability (ARI):
18.59

Reading Time

about a minute or two