FR 2025-00096

Overview

Title

Pesticide Product Registration; Receipt of Applications for New Uses (November 2024)

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The EPA is checking if some bug-killing products can be used in new ways and wants people to say what they think by February 6, 2025. They’ll read everyone’s ideas first before deciding.

Summary AI

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced that it received applications to approve new uses for specific pesticide products containing already registered active ingredients. Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), the EPA is offering the public the opportunity to comment on these applications. Comments must be submitted by February 6, 2025. The notice includes detailed information on how to submit comments and highlights that this announcement does not indicate that decisions have been made on the applications.

Abstract

EPA has received applications to register new uses for pesticide products containing currently registered active ingredients. Pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA is hereby providing notice of receipt and opportunity to comment on these applications.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 1127
Document #: 2025-00096
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 1127-1127

AnalysisAI

The recent notice by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) outlines a call for public comments on the applications for new uses of certain pesticide products that contain active ingredients already registered. This process occurs under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Comments from the public must be submitted by February 6, 2025, offering an opportunity for individuals and organizations to express their views or concerns regarding the proposed pesticide uses.

General Overview

The document serves as a formal announcement from the EPA, informing the public that new use applications for registered pesticide ingredients have been received. This procedural step is part of the EPA's regulatory process aimed at ensuring that all potential impacts of pesticide usage are thoroughly evaluated with input from various stakeholders. The notice is an essential aspect of maintaining transparency and public involvement in environmental regulatory processes.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from the document that warrant closer examination:

  1. Criteria Ambiguity: The document does not elaborate on the specific criteria the EPA will use to assess the applications. This omission could lead to uncertainty regarding how these applications are evaluated, making it challenging for stakeholders to tailor their comments effectively.

  2. Submission of Confidential Information: Readers are warned not to submit Confidential Business Information (CBI) or restricted information via the online portal or email. While this is prudent advice, the notice fails to highlight secure alternatives for such submissions, potentially leaving applicants uncertain about how to safely provide sensitive information.

  3. Perceived Favoritism: The document references only one applicant, Vestaron Corporation, which may raise questions about how other applicants are integrated into the process. The lack of mentions of additional companies or products could imply bias or favor toward this single entity, intentionally or otherwise.

  4. Complex Language: The guidance on submitting CBI is somewhat complex, particularly concerning mailing procedures via disk or CD-ROM. This complexity might hinder the understanding of stakeholders not well-versed in regulatory or legal language.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this document underscores the EPA's commitment to involving the public in its regulatory functions. By seeking comments, the EPA encourages civic engagement and ensures that community concerns can be reflected in the final decision-making process. This transparency can bolster public trust in environmental governance.

Stakeholder Impacts

For specific stakeholders, such as agricultural producers, food manufacturers, and pesticide manufacturers, this notice has practical implications. These groups have a vested interest in the outcome of these applications, as new pesticide uses could influence their operations, product offerings, or regulatory compliance requirements. If approved, new pesticide applications might lead to increased versatility or efficiency in pest control methods, benefitting growers and producers. Conversely, new regulations could impose additional compliance costs or necessitate operational changes.

Overall, this EPA notice is a call to action for concerned parties to voice their perspectives, albeit within a framework that may require more clarity and inclusivity to ensure fair and comprehensive input into the pesticide approval process.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific details about the criteria for evaluating the applications, which might lead to ambiguity on how decisions will be made.

  • • The text advises not to submit Confidential Business Information (CBI) via regulations.gov or email, but it does not specify alternative secure methods for submitting CBI.

  • • There is potential for perceived favoritism as only one applicant, Vestaron Corporation, is mentioned, without details on how other applications are handled or considered.

  • • The language discussing how to submit CBI is somewhat complex, and might be difficult for some readers to follow, particularly regarding the handling of disk or CD-ROM submissions.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 784
Sentences: 44
Entities: 64

Language

Nouns: 280
Verbs: 58
Adjectives: 21
Adverbs: 13
Numbers: 40

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.22
Average Sentence Length:
17.82
Token Entropy:
5.23
Readability (ARI):
15.24

Reading Time

about 2 minutes