FR 2025-00093

Overview

Title

Combined Notice of Filings #1

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Energy Department is looking at how some electric companies want to change their business or rates, and they are asking people to help decide if these changes are fair and good for everyone. People can find more information online and tell the department what they think.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission received various filings related to electric corporate actions and electric rate changes by different companies. Several applications seek authorization under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act, while others pertain to triennial market power analyses for the Southwest Power Pool Inc. and other regions. The document details the companies involved, filing dates, accession numbers, and deadlines for public comments. The information can be accessed via the Commission's eLibrary system, and interested parties are encouraged to eFile interventions, protests, and other related documents. The Commission's Office of Public Participation is available to assist the public with these processes.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 1117
Document #: 2025-00093
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 1117-1118

AnalysisAI

The document, titled "Combined Notice of Filings #1," as published in the Federal Register, provides information on recent filings that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has received related to electric corporate activities and rate changes. These filings include applications for authorization under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act, as well as triennial market power analyses for specific regions like the Southwest Power Pool Inc. The document details the companies involved, the filing dates, the corresponding docket and accession numbers, and deadlines for public comments.

Summary

In essence, the document serves as a formal notice about actions pending before the Commission that could directly affect energy markets and, by extension, the general public. It offers pathways for interested parties to intervene, protest, or offer compliance with these pending actions through outlined deadlines for comments. The document also points towards external resources where these actions can be further explored, such as FERC’s eLibrary system.

Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from the document due to its technical details and legal nature. Firstly, it does not provide specific insights into how authorizations under Section 203 are determined by the Commission, leaving the public in the dark about the criteria or reasoning behind these decisions. Moreover, the descriptions of the corporate filings are generally devoid of significant background information that could elucidate their broader implications, making it difficult for an average reader to gauge their potential impact or importance.

Additionally, the document mentions Triennial Market Power Analyses—a critical aspect concerning market competition—but fails to explain their significance or what stakeholders should look for. This could potentially lessen its utility for the public, as these assessments speak directly to issues of market dominance and fairness in pricing.

Considering the dense listing of docket and accession numbers without adequate context or explanation, the text might overwhelm or confuse those unfamiliar with such procedures. Furthermore, although the document references procedures for public engagement like intervening or protesting, it assumes a level of prior knowledge or legal literacy that average individuals might not have.

Public Impact

Broadly, this notice invites public participation in a transparent regulatory process that ultimately influences energy pricing and availability. It calls attention to the importance of public vigilance in corporate matters involving essential utilities like electricity provision. However, the complexity of the information and process may inhibit effective public engagement, especially if individuals are not experienced in navigating legal or regulatory systems.

Stakeholder Impact

For specific stakeholders, such as energy companies mentioned within the document and those within the regions affected, the filings could profoundly affect market operations and regulatory compliance norms. While these entities might have the resources and experience to navigate the filings and engage with FERC’s processes effectively, small businesses or individual stakeholders may find themselves at a disadvantage due to the document’s complexity and reliance on additional, external resources for crucial information.

The provision of multiple contact points and the mention of the Commission's Office of Public Participation indicate an attempt to support meaningful public engagement. Nonetheless, without clearer guidance on the roles and specific aid each contact can offer, there remains potential for miscommunication and unaddressed concerns, stymying effective public participation.

Overall, while the document underscores the principle of regulatory transparency, its efficacy in fostering public understanding and engagement is questionable due to its technicality and the assumption of a baseline knowledge among its readers. For individuals and entities willing to invest the time to understand and intervene in these processes, the document represents an opportunity; for others, it remains an opaque reminder of the complexities of energy regulation.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific details on how the authorization under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act is determined, which might make it difficult for the public to understand the criteria or process used.

  • • The description of the applications and filings lack detailed background information that might be necessary for a thorough understanding of the potential impacts or importance of each filing.

  • • The document does not explain the implications of the Triennial Market Power Analysis, which could be relevant for stakeholders or the public concerned about market power and competition.

  • • The document includes a large amount of docket numbers and accession numbers without providing context, which could be overwhelming or confusing for the average reader.

  • • The process for intervening, protesting, or answering a complaint is referenced but not fully explained, leaving gaps in understanding for those unfamiliar with the Commission's regulations.

  • • There is reliance on external links (to the eLibrary system and filing requirements) for more information, which could be problematic if the links are inaccessible or outdated.

  • • The document refers to specific customer service contacts and offices for assistance but does not outline what specific assistance each contact can provide, potentially leading to confusion or misdirected inquiries.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 2,232
Sentences: 96
Entities: 331

Language

Nouns: 921
Verbs: 47
Adjectives: 18
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 268

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.08
Average Sentence Length:
23.25
Token Entropy:
4.76
Readability (ARI):
16.56

Reading Time

about 7 minutes