FR 2025-00070

Overview

Title

Notice of Availability of Designation of Chinese Military Companies

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The U.S. Department of Defense says some companies, like Huawei and Tencent, are connected to the Chinese military and wants to tell people who these companies are; if a company thinks it's on the list by mistake, it can ask to be taken off.

Summary AI

The Department of Defense has identified several companies as "Chinese military companies" in accordance with the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act. This list includes entities such as 360 Security Technology, Huawei, and Tencent Holdings, among others. These designations mean the companies are linked to the Chinese military, and the list must be updated and published annually until 2030. Companies on this list have the option to request reconsideration if they believe they were wrongly included.

Abstract

The Deputy Secretary of Defense has determined that the entities listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice qualify as "Chinese military companies" in accordance with the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 1105
Document #: 2025-00070
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 1105-1106

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register provides an official notice from the Department of Defense, which has identified and listed several companies as "Chinese military companies." This determination is in accordance with the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. The notice includes a detailed list of companies believed to have ties to the Chinese military, and it mandates that such a list be published annually until December 31, 2030.

General Summary

The notice, published by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, outlines the identification of entities deemed as "Chinese military companies" operating in the United States. This list includes well-known companies such as Huawei, Tencent Holdings, and many others, signaling possible implications for national security and economic relations. Additionally, the document offers an opportunity for entities to challenge their inclusion through a reconsideration process. This involves submitting a request with relevant supporting evidence.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A key concern with this document is the lack of clarity regarding the specific criteria or guidelines used to designate these companies as "Chinese military companies." The broad listing of entities without detailed reasoning may lead to disputes with affected companies. Furthermore, the document does not provide thorough procedural guidance for the reconsideration process, such as timelines for submission and review of requests, which could create confusion for companies seeking to contest their inclusion.

Another issue arises from the potential ambiguity of the term "Chinese military companies." Without a clear definition within the document, stakeholders may struggle to understand the precise nature of such associations with the Chinese military. Finally, the document mentions the removal of some previously listed companies but fails to thoroughly explain the rationale behind those removals, raising transparency concerns.

Public Impact

The publication of this list has broad implications for both the public and businesses. For the general populace, it signifies ongoing national security efforts to monitor and possibly restrict certain companies’ operations within the United States. The public may benefit from these actions, presuming they contribute to increased national security.

However, the list could also impact consumer choices by potentially restricting access to products from these companies. Additionally, the inclusion of these companies might influence business operations and employment within U.S.-based subsidiaries or affiliates of the listed companies.

Impact on Stakeholders

For the companies identified, being listed as a "Chinese military company" could have significant negative impacts. It may result in restricted access to U.S. capital markets, loss of business partnerships, or damage to their reputation. These companies might face challenges in proving that their inclusion was unwarranted due to the document's lack of detailed appeal procedures.

From a national security standpoint, the document supports the U.S. government's efforts to safeguard interests and reduce potential risks associated with foreign entities linked to military activities. This might positively strengthen regulatory measures and oversight. However, the overly broad approach without detailed guidance could negatively affect international trade relations and diplomatic ties.

Conclusion

This Federal Register notice plays a crucial role in the U.S. national security framework. While it aims to address potential risks related to the Chinese military's influence over certain companies, its lack of transparency and clarity may spur challenges from various stakeholders. Greater detail and precision in defining criteria and providing procedural guidance are needed to ensure fairness and clarity in its implementation.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific criteria or guidelines on how entities are determined to qualify as 'Chinese military companies', which may lead to ambiguity or disputes.

  • • There is a large number of entities listed as 'Chinese military companies' which could be seen as overly broad without clear reasoning provided.

  • • The process for reconsideration of the decision to list a company is mentioned but it lacks detailed procedural guidance, such as timelines for submission and review, which could lead to confusion.

  • • The term 'Chinese military companies' might not be adequately defined within this document, leading to potential ambiguity.

  • • The document removal process for previously listed companies lacks a detailed explanation of the criteria or reasoning behind such removals, which could raise transparency concerns.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,775
Sentences: 39
Entities: 219

Language

Nouns: 992
Verbs: 42
Adjectives: 22
Adverbs: 9
Numbers: 35

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.90
Average Sentence Length:
45.51
Token Entropy:
4.89
Readability (ARI):
27.22

Reading Time

about 7 minutes