FR 2024-31778

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activities; Extension of Previously Approved eCollection eComments Requested; Semiannual Progress Report for Grantees From the Engaging Men and Youth Program

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government wants some feedback on a plan to keep track of a program that helps stop violence by teaching boys and men to be nice; they ask certain groups to tell them how things are going twice a year.📝

Summary AI

The Department of Justice's Office on Violence Against Women is seeking public comments on the proposed extension of a previously approved information collection related to the Engaging Men and Youth Program. This program supports initiatives to prevent violence against women and girls by involving boys and men. The collection is set to involve approximately 8 grantees, requiring them to submit semiannual progress reports. Public comments are invited until February 10, 2025, and can be submitted via the federal website for reviews.

Abstract

The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office on Violence Against Women, will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 2030
Document #: 2024-31778
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 2030-2031

AnalysisAI

The document at hand is a notice from the Department of Justice (DOJ), specifically from the Office on Violence Against Women. It seeks public comments on a proposed extension for an information collection related to the Engaging Men and Youth Program. This initiative supports efforts to prevent violence against women and girls by actively involving boys and men in the solution. The notice outlines the logistics of collecting semiannual progress reports from about eight grantees involved in the program, emphasizing the need for public feedback on the initiative by February 10, 2025.

General Summary

The DOJ is requesting an extension of an already approved information collection procedure under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Grantees from the Engaging Men and Youth Program, approximately eight in number, are required to provide detailed progress reports twice a year. This is part of the department's broader strategy to engage community partners in efforts against gender-based violence. The department encourages stakeholders and the general public to review and comment on the efficacy, necessity, and design of this data collection process.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several potential issues with the document. Although it mentions that the review process has an estimated cost of $9 to the federal government, it provides no detailed explanation of what this amount covers. A clearer cost breakdown would be beneficial, as it can help taxpayers understand how resources are utilized.

The language used to describe eligible grantees is somewhat complicated, listing various nonprofit and governmental entities. Simplifying this language could help readers understand which types of organizations are eligible to participate.

Moreover, the document employs bureaucratic jargon, such as "PRA authorization" and "ICR," without providing definitions or sufficient context. This could be confusing for individuals unfamiliar with government documentation. Additionally, the text repeats information about the total annual hour burden, which may be an editorial oversight that could confuse readers.

Potential Impacts on the Public

Broadly speaking, the document's aims align with efforts to foster community involvement in reducing gender-based violence. For the general public, the initiative may represent a positive step toward holistic community safety and violence reduction. However, the use of complex bureaucratic language can be a barrier to participation, possibly discouraging public commentary and engagement.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders involved directly with the Engaging Men and Youth Program, such as nonprofit organizations and community service providers, this document indicates continued government support and active engagement in combating violence. It potentially offers continued financial and structural resources, which is beneficial. However, the restricted eligibility criteria might limit participation to certain types of organizations, possibly excluding other entities that could effectively contribute to the initiative's goals.

Overall, while the notice promotes an important cause, better clarity and transparency could enhance public understanding and engagement. Improved communication might encourage wider participation from various sectors in this valuable government program.

Issues

  • • The document discusses potential costs to the Federal Government but does not provide detailed information on the estimated $9 annualized costs for OVW staff review of the progress reports. It would be beneficial to have a breakdown to understand what this cost entails.

  • • The affected public includes nonprofit and governmental entities that are eligible to receive grants from the Engaging Men and Youth Program, which might appear as favoring these types of organizations over others that might also contribute to the program's goals.

  • • The language describing the affected public could be perceived as complex, with various kinds of organizations listed; this list could be clarified or simplified.

  • • The document uses bureaucratic and legal terminology (e.g., PRA authorization, ICR) without sufficient explanation, which may be unclear for the general public.

  • • The document mentions that the proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register allowing a 60-day comment period but doesn't clarify any outcomes or changes made as a result of that previous comment period.

  • • The total annual burden section repeats the exact same information twice, which may be an editorial oversight and might confuse readers.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,062
Sentences: 38
Entities: 80

Language

Nouns: 348
Verbs: 88
Adjectives: 54
Adverbs: 15
Numbers: 57

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.42
Average Sentence Length:
27.95
Token Entropy:
5.25
Readability (ARI):
21.68

Reading Time

about 4 minutes