FR 2024-31693

Overview

Title

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Blanding Municipal Airport, Blanding, UT

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The people at the airport in Blanding, Utah, want to change how high airplanes can fly in a special sky zone so they can fly better in bad weather. They are asking everyone to tell them what they think about this plan.

Summary AI

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has proposed a new rule to adjust the Class E airspace around Blanding Municipal Airport in Utah. This proposal aims to create new Class E airspace from 700 feet above the ground while removing existing Class E airspace that begins at 1,200 feet, which has become unnecessary due to other airspace coverage. The changes are meant to improve the airport's operations, particularly for instrument flight rules (IFR), and include updates to the airport's legal description. The public is invited to comment on this proposal by February 21, 2025.

Abstract

This action proposes to establish Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface and revoke Class E airspace extending from 1,200 feet above the surface at Blanding Municipal Airport, Blanding, UT. Additionally, this action proposes administrative amendments to update the airport's legal description. These actions would support the airport's current instrument flight rules (IFR) operations that lack containment.

Citation: 90 FR 1049
Document #: 2024-31693
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 1049-1050

AnalysisAI

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has proposed a rule change involving the adjustment of airspace classifications at the Blanding Municipal Airport in Blanding, Utah. This proposal primarily aims to modify the Class E airspace surrounding the airport. Specifically, the new rule would establish Class E airspace starting 700 feet above the ground, while removing the Class E airspace that currently begins at 1,200 feet. The changes are intended to enhance the airport's operations, especially those relying on instrument flight rules (IFR). Additionally, the legal description of the airport will be updated as part of this process. The FAA has invited public feedback on the proposal by February 21, 2025.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One concern with the document is the complexity of the terminology used in describing airspace boundaries and coordinates. For example, terms like "Class E airspace" and references to specific latitudinal and longitudinal points might be challenging for individuals who lack expertise in aviation. This complexity could pose difficulties for those trying to interpret the practical ramifications of the proposed changes.

Another issue is that the document references several external regulatory documents and orders, such as FAA Order JO 7400.11J and 14 CFR part 71, without providing concise summaries of their contents. Readers who are not familiar with these documents may struggle to fully grasp the implications of the proposed rule changes without additional context.

On the environmental front, the proposal mentions the need for an environmental analysis under FAA Order 1050.1F but lacks details or preliminary findings. This omission could be a concern for stakeholders focused on potential environmental impacts, as they may not find the necessary information to assess whether the proposal aligns with their environmental priorities.

Public Impact

Broadly speaking, the proposed adjustments to airspace will likely impact those involved in aviation and air traffic management more directly than the general public. The changes aim to streamline airspace management around Blanding Municipal Airport, potentially making its operations more efficient and safer. This might indirectly benefit local economies or travelers by enhancing the reliability of flight operations.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For professionals in aviation, such as pilots and air traffic controllers, the establishment and revocation of certain airspace segments may change procedures for flight navigation and coordination. This could have positive impacts by clarifying or simplifying flight paths and airspace use around the airport.

Conversely, environmental groups or local residents concerned about aviation noise or emissions might view the lack of detailed environmental analysis as a negative factor. Without specific data or findings, it is difficult to assess how the proposed rule changes might affect the local environment.

Additionally, the proposal assumes that potential commenters can easily access and navigate online platforms to submit feedback. This might not be the case for all stakeholders, particularly those with limited internet access or unfamiliarity with digital processes, potentially restricting their ability to participate in the rulemaking process.

Overall, while the proposal seeks to improve air traffic operations at Blanding Municipal Airport, its implications, particularly regarding terminology and ancillary documents, require careful consideration to ensure comprehensive understanding and engagement from all stakeholders.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify any specific financial cost implications, making it difficult to audit for potential wasteful spending.

  • • The language used in describing the airspace boundaries and coordinates may be complex for individuals not familiar with aviation terminology.

  • • The proposal mentions environmental analysis under FAA Order 1050.1F but does not provide any details or preliminary findings, which might be a concern for stakeholders interested in environmental impacts.

  • • The document references numerous external documents and orders, such as FAA Order JO 7400.11J and 14 CFR part 71, without summarizing their contents, potentially making it difficult for readers unfamiliar with these documents to fully understand the proposal.

  • • There is an assumption that all stakeholders are able to access and understand online materials and databases, which might not be the case for all potential commenters.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,851
Sentences: 60
Entities: 192

Language

Nouns: 656
Verbs: 142
Adjectives: 65
Adverbs: 39
Numbers: 124

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.89
Average Sentence Length:
30.85
Token Entropy:
5.62
Readability (ARI):
20.57

Reading Time

about 7 minutes