FR 2024-31652

Overview

Title

Combined Notice of Filings

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government has new papers about rules for some big gas pipes, and if people want to say what they think about it, they have until January 2025 to do it. They can see the papers online, and there's a special office that can help them understand.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has received several filings related to natural gas pipelines. These include a petition from Buckeye Pipe Line Company and rate filings from ETC Tiger Pipeline, Gulf Run Transmission, and others. Interested parties have deadlines in January 2025 to comment on these filings. The filings can be accessed through the Commission's eLibrary system, and the Commission's Office of Public Participation is available to help the public engage with the processes.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 637
Document #: 2024-31652
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 637-637

AnalysisAI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has released a notice containing several filings related to natural gas pipeline operations. These filings include procedural documents like petitions and rate adjustments from organizations like Buckeye Pipe Line Company and other major pipeline operators. The notice outlines the schedule for commenting on these submissions, allowing interested parties until mid-January 2025 to provide their input.

General Summary

This document serves as a formal notification regarding the submissions received by FERC concerning various natural gas pipeline activities. It is an announcement of administrative actions taken by companies in the energy sector, specifically addressing rate changes and procedural compliance aspects of pipeline operations. Interested parties, such as other energy companies or stakeholders, have specified windows for commenting on these filings, which could influence decisions made by the Commission.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several key concerns arise from the nature and presentation of this notice. Firstly, the document lacks clarity for a lay audience. Its oblique language and technical jargon could be a hurdle for individuals not intimately familiar with legal or regulatory proceedings involving energy sectors. This complexity can overshadow the document’s purpose — to ensure public engagement in energy regulation.

Another issue is the absence of financial details regarding the impact these rate changes and filings may have. Such information would be valuable not only for experts conducting financial audits but also for public stakeholders trying to understand potential economic implications.

Public Impact

For the general public, the document may seem abstruse, given its technical depth and the nature of regulatory language used. Engagement from the public might be limited due to a lack of understanding of how these filings could affect energy prices or supply. As energy rates and pipeline operations have direct consequences on domestic utility bills, it is crucial for consumers to grasp these changes easily.

Impact on Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, like environmental groups, landowners, and community organizations, might find the document significant. It represents an opportunity to intervene in or comment on proceedings that may impact environmental practices or land use. However, the complexity of the text might deter meaningful participation, unless stakeholders have access to legal expertise or resources to demystify the content.

On a positive note, entities directly involved in these filings, such as pipeline companies, can anticipate procedural clarity and opportunities for their operational enhancements. The structured nature of these filings allows stakeholders with regulatory expertise to engage deeply, though it might marginalize those without similar resources.

In conclusion, while this notice is a vital component of regulatory transparency, its accessibility and engagement potential are constrained by its complexity and technical language. Simplification and clarification of such documents could better serve the public interest, allowing more meaningful participation and understanding of regulatory actions in the energy sector.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide any information about potential budgetary spending or financial implications of the filings, which might be pertinent for an audit focused on wasteful spending.

  • • The repetitive nature of the format for each filing might make it less clear and engaging for general public understanding and participation.

  • • The language is generally specific to regulatory filings, which may be complex for individuals unfamiliar with legal or regulatory proceedings, potentially limiting public engagement.

  • • The description of each docket and rate filing is highly technical, which could be difficult for someone without a regulatory or energy background to fully understand.

  • • The metadata lacks an abstract, which could be useful for quickly summarizing the content and purpose of the notice.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 897
Sentences: 59
Entities: 101

Language

Nouns: 295
Verbs: 42
Adjectives: 24
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 95

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.97
Average Sentence Length:
15.20
Token Entropy:
4.71
Readability (ARI):
16.99

Reading Time

about 3 minutes