FR 2024-31649

Overview

Title

Rover Pipeline LLC; Notice of Schedule for the Preparation of an Environmental Assessment for the Rover-Bulger Delivery Meter Station Project

Agencies

ELI5 AI

Rover Pipeline wants to make their gas stations in Pennsylvania bigger, and some people are checking if it's okay for nature. They have to decide by May, and other offices must say "yes" or "no" by August.

Summary AI

Rover Pipeline LLC has applied for permission to expand its natural gas facilities in Pennsylvania, specifically the Bulger Compressor Station and Harmon Creek Meter Station. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) plans to prepare an environmental assessment for this project, with the review expected to be completed by May 5, 2025. If the environmental assessment is completed on time, federal agencies will have until August 4, 2025, to make their decisions regarding necessary approvals. This project will help ensure that natural gas delivery requests from Range Resources—Appalachia LLC are met efficiently.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 636
Document #: 2024-31649
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 636-637

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register outlines a significant step for Rover Pipeline LLC's plans to expand its natural gas facilities in Washington County, Pennsylvania. Specifically, Rover Pipeline LLC seeks to enhance its existing Bulger Compressor Station and Harmon Creek Meter Station. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is set to conduct an environmental assessment to evaluate the potential impacts of the project, with completion expected by May 5, 2025. Following this assessment, other federal agencies will have until August 4, 2025, to decide on necessary permits and approvals related to the project.

General Summary

Rover Pipeline LLC has submitted an application to FERC to obtain a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, which is necessary for projects involving the construction and operation of pipeline facilities. The primary goal of the project is to ensure that Rover can meet the natural gas transportation demands of Range Resources—Appalachia LLC. The planned expansions will potentially facilitate the receipt of up to an additional 400,000 dekatherms of natural gas per day, thus enhancing the overall capacity and reliability of the pipeline system.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One notable concern is the absence of detailed cost estimates for the expansion project in the document. This omission may raise questions about potential financial implications and whether funds will be used efficiently. Additionally, the document uses specialized terminology, such as "dekatherms" and "blanket certificate authority," without adequate explanation, which could lead to confusion among the general public. Moreover, the rationale behind requiring Rover Pipeline LLC to file a specific application instead of using blanket authority is not sufficiently addressed, leaving some procedural aspects unexplained.

Furthermore, while the document mentions the eSubscription service provided by FERC, it does not elaborate on how this service functions, which could be confusing for those unfamiliar with it. The timeline for decision-making by various agencies is clearly stated but lacks context about what might happen if these deadlines are not met.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

For the broader public, the environmental assessment conducted by FERC is crucial as it considers potential environmental effects and aims to ensure that development occurs responsibly. However, the document does not clearly articulate how the project might benefit the local community or address broader public concerns. This could lead to perceptions that the project primarily serves the interests of Rover Pipeline LLC and its clients, like Range Resources—Appalachia LLC, rather than delivering tangible community benefits.

For stakeholders such as landowners, environmental groups, and local governments, the document represents an opportunity to engage during the scoping period and provide input on the environmental issues that need consideration during the assessment process. The Commission's Office of Public Participation can support public engagement, but stakeholders may find navigating FERC's processes challenging without prior knowledge.

Overall, while the project has the potential to boost regional energy infrastructure, it is imperative for FERC and Rover Pipeline LLC to communicate more transparently about the project details, its benefits, and any potential environmental or social impacts, to foster better understanding and trust among all stakeholders.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide detailed cost estimates for the proposed project, which could lead to concerns about wasteful spending.

  • • There is no clear explanation of why Rover Pipeline LLC needs to file an application rather than using blanket certificate authority, which may cause confusion.

  • • The document uses technical jargon without sufficient explanation, such as 'dekatherms' and 'blanket certificate authority,' which may be difficult for the general public to understand.

  • • The document's explanation of the eSubscription service is referenced but not directly explained within the text, which may lead to misunderstandings for individuals unfamiliar with the service.

  • • The timeline for agency decisions is given but lacks context as to the repercussions if these deadlines are not met.

  • • The benefits of the project to the public or local community are not clearly outlined, which could raise concerns about favoring the organization's interests over public benefits.

  • • The document assumes familiarity with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's processes and regulations, which could be unclear for those not familiar with FERC.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 946
Sentences: 33
Entities: 96

Language

Nouns: 323
Verbs: 76
Adjectives: 57
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 51

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.27
Average Sentence Length:
28.67
Token Entropy:
5.29
Readability (ARI):
21.24

Reading Time

about 3 minutes