FR 2024-31617

Overview

Title

Air Quality Designations; KY; Redesignation of the Kentucky Portion of the Louisville, KY-IN 2015 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area to Attainment

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The EPA is saying "no" to Kentucky's idea to call part of Louisville's air clean because it's not meeting the rules yet. They're also not deciding on any plans to keep the air clean or how to cut down on air pollution right now.

Summary AI

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to deny Kentucky's request to redesignate the Kentucky portion of the Louisville, KY-IN area from a nonattainment to an attainment zone for the 2015 8-hour ozone standards. This decision is based on the area's failure to meet the air quality standards due to violations recorded in 2023. The EPA is making no decisions on Kentucky's maintenance plan, nor on emissions budgets for nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds. Public comments on this proposed action are being accepted until February 3, 2025.

Abstract

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is withdrawing its proposed approval of the request to redesignate the Kentucky portion of the Louisville, Kentucky-Indiana, 2015 8-hour ozone nonattainment area (hereinafter referred to as the "Louisville, KY-IN Area" or "Area") to attainment for the 2015 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or standards). EPA is withdrawing its April 18, 2023, proposed approval and is now proposing to deny Kentucky's request to redesignate the Kentucky portion of the Area from nonattainment to attainment, based on the Area's violation of the NAAQS. EPA is taking no action at this time on Kentucky's maintenance plan, including the regional motor vehicle emission budgets for nitrogen oxides (NO<INF>X</INF>) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) for the years of 2019 and 2035, submitted with Kentucky's redesignation request for the Louisville, KY-IN Area. The redesignation request and maintenance plan state implementation plan (SIP) revision were submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, through the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet (Cabinet), Division of Air Quality (DAQ), on September 6, 2022.

Citation: 90 FR 294
Document #: 2024-31617
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 294-297

AnalysisAI

Summary

The document from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) involves the decision on whether the Kentucky portion of the Louisville area should be redesignated from a nonattainment area to an attainment area concerning the 2015 8-hour ozone standards. The EPA initially proposed approval but has now reversed its stance due to ozone standard violations recorded in 2023. This suggests that the area has not consistently maintained the necessary air quality standards to justify a change in designation.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The document is laden with technical jargon and references to specific sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA) that may not be easily understood by a general audience. Terms like "3-year design value" and references to legal precedents are complex and could benefit from simplification or explanation to ensure public understanding. Additionally, while the document opens a period for public comments, it does not clarify how these comments will be used to influence the final decision, raising potential concerns about transparency in the decision-making process.

Moreover, there are no evaluations or considerations of environmental justice (EJ) implications in the decision, which might be seen as a lack of inclusivity in the process. This oversight could be significant for communities that traditionally bear the brunt of environmental challenges.

Public Impact

For the general public, this document highlights the regulatory complexities of meeting environmental standards and the ongoing challenges involved in combating pollution. It underlines the importance of maintaining air quality and the stringent standards that must be met for redesignation. If the redesignation request were approved without meeting the standards, it could lead to public health repercussions, affecting communities by allowing higher pollution levels.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For residents in the Kentucky portion of the Louisville area, the EPA's proposed denial means continued efforts will be necessary to meet air quality standards. This could involve stricter regulations on local industries and more robust community programs aimed at reducing emissions, potentially impacting daily life and economic activities.

On the other hand, environmental groups and public health advocates might view this decision positively as it upholds stringent air quality standards, potentially preventing health issues associated with poor air quality. Industries in the area may be negatively impacted, as they might face higher compliance costs to reduce emissions and meet these standards.

In conclusion, while the EPA's proposed action underscores a commitment to maintaining air quality, the document's complexity and lack of consideration for broader social implications necessitate further engagement with the affected public to ensure comprehensive and inclusive environmental governance.

Issues

  • • The document contains very technical and complex language that may be difficult for a general audience to understand, such as references to specific sections of the Clean Air Act and terms like '3-year design value.'

  • • There is a potential issue of transparency as the document mentions that comments are made publicly available, but details of how this impacts decision-making are not explicitly clear.

  • • The document references multiple legal precedents and technical data without providing summaries or explanations that make these references accessible to lay readers.

  • • EJ (Environmental Justice) considerations were not evaluated in the decision-making process, which may raise concerns about the inclusiveness of the evaluation process when denying the redesignation request.

  • • While not immediately wasteful, the document's decision might imply costs associated with continued efforts to meet air quality standards that are not clarified in the proposal.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 4
Words: 4,783
Sentences: 144
Entities: 511

Language

Nouns: 1,646
Verbs: 361
Adjectives: 185
Adverbs: 63
Numbers: 291

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.96
Average Sentence Length:
33.22
Token Entropy:
5.80
Readability (ARI):
22.14

Reading Time

about 18 minutes