FR 2024-31576

Overview

Title

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or Bank Holding Company

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Federal Reserve System is letting people know that a few individuals want to buy or control more shares in certain banks. People have until January 21, 2025, to say what they think about this, but they must be careful not to share any secret information.

Summary AI

The Federal Reserve System has received applications from individuals who aim to acquire or retain control of shares in certain banks or bank holding companies. The public can view these applications at specific Federal Reserve Banks and submit comments by January 21, 2025. Comments are publicly disclosed and must not include confidential information. Specific applications include one from Stephen J. Lee to manage shares in Bastrop Bancshares, Inc., and another from Charles Diesing to acquire more shares in Liberty Northwest Bancorp, Inc.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 318
Document #: 2024-31576
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 318-319

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Document

The notice from the Federal Reserve System involves applications under the Change in Bank Control Act, where specific individuals are pursuing control or increased shareholding in certain banks or bank holding companies. The document lists the public procedure for reviewing these applications and invites the public to provide comments. The notice specifically mentions Stephen J. Lee and Charles Diesing as applicants seeking to control voting shares in respective banking entities. Comments must be submitted by January 21, 2025, and are subject to public disclosure.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One noticeable issue with the document is the absence of an abstract in the metadata section. An abstract would offer a concise summary, making it easier for readers to quickly understand the notice's purpose and importance. Furthermore, the document's language lacks specificity regarding the criteria used for assessing these applications, referencing only 'paragraph 7 of the Act.' This might not be immediately comprehensible to people unfamiliar with the legislation, potentially hindering effective public participation and understanding of the process.

Another concern is the lack of a clear rationale for why these particular individuals and organizations are being considered, which could raise questions about partiality or favoritism. Additionally, while the document states that public comments will be disclosed, it fails to adequately instruct commenters on protecting sensitive information. This omission might result in individuals unknowingly exposing confidential details.

Impact on the Public Broadly

For the general public, this notice informs about procedural and governance aspects concerning significant control in banking institutions. The invitation to comment presents an opportunity for civic engagement and transparency, allowing stakeholders to voice their opinions on proposed changes that could influence local banking landscapes and, by extension, the availability of financial services in their communities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impact: For the applicants such as Stephen J. Lee and Charles Diesing, the notice functions as a formal and transparent means to retain or acquire greater economic influence within specific financial institutions. Successful applications under this act may provide them increased strategic influence and potential financial benefits stemming from larger ownership stakes.

Negative Impact: Conversely, the existing shareholders or stakeholders in these banking entities might view these changes as a threat to their current control or influence. They may also be concerned about potentially shifting corporate strategies that could indirectly affect their investments or dealings with the bank.

Overall, the notice serves a dual purpose, providing both transparency in regulatory processes and enabling public insight into financial governance. The mechanisms of public commentary and disclosure aim to ensure that broader community interests are considered in changes of bank control, although greater efforts to enhance public comprehension and confidential information protection would further bolster public trust and clarity.

Issues

  • • The document lacks an abstract in the metadata, which could help in understanding the purpose of the notice more quickly.

  • • There is no clear indication of why these specific individuals and organizations are being considered for approval under the Change in Bank Control Act, which might prompt questions about favoritism.

  • • The document does not specify the criteria used for assessing the applications beyond referencing 'paragraph 7 of the Act,' which may not be immediately clear to all readers.

  • • The abbreviation 'FR Doc.' followed by numbers may not be immediately understood by all readers without additional context.

  • • While the document mentions that comments received will be disclosed, it does not provide detailed guidance on how individuals can ensure that confidential information is adequately protected.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 551
Sentences: 21
Entities: 73

Language

Nouns: 202
Verbs: 34
Adjectives: 19
Adverbs: 15
Numbers: 29

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.97
Average Sentence Length:
26.24
Token Entropy:
4.94
Readability (ARI):
18.67

Reading Time

about 2 minutes