Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Energy Department is checking some paperwork from companies that move natural gas through big tubes across different places. These papers talk about money rules and changes in their plans, and people can say if they agree or disagree by a certain date.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission received several filings related to natural gas pipeline rate and refund reports. Arrowhead Gulf Coast Pipeline, LLC seeks approval for an accounting entry related to acquiring the VP North Pipeline System, while El Paso Natural Gas Company and Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC submitted rate filings connected to negotiated rate agreements. Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C. filed an update about removing a negotiated rate program. People interested in these cases need to submit comments or protests by specified dates, which are detailed in the report. The Commission encourages public participation through its Office of Public Participation, offering assistance in navigating the filing processes.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The recent document from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) outlines a series of filings concerning natural gas pipeline rates and refunds. These filings involve multiple companies, each seeking approval for different financial and administrative changes. Arrowhead Gulf Coast Pipeline, LLC is requesting approval for an accounting entry related to its acquisition of a pipeline system. Meanwhile, El Paso Natural Gas Company and Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC have submitted rate filings tied to negotiated rate agreements. Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C. is updating an administrative filing to remove a previously negotiated rate program.
Summary of the Notice
The document primarily serves as a notification to interested parties about the ongoing regulatory procedures and deadlines for submitting comments or protests related to these filings. It emphasizes the importance of following specific rules and regulations to become a party to these proceedings, highlighting the procedural intricacies involved.
Significant Issues
Complex Language: The language is largely technical and assumes familiarity with FERC’s regulatory framework, which could present challenges for individuals without specialized knowledge. Terms like "Docket Numbers" and procedural references such as "§ 4(d) Rate Filing" may be daunting for the uninitiated.
Abstract Absence: The lack of a concise abstract makes it difficult for readers to quickly grasp the essentials of the notice, which could hamper understanding and timely response from stakeholders.
Resource Accessibility: The document directs users to various online resources for more information, assuming a level of digital literacy and internet access that might not be available to all interested parties.
Impact on the Public
This document impacts the public in several ways. It plays a critical role in informing stakeholders, such as landowners or consumer advocacy groups, about changes that might affect natural gas rates and pipeline infrastructures. This can influence energy costs and availability, subsequently affecting household and industrial energy expenditures.
Stakeholder Impacts
Public Participation: The document underscores the role of the Commission’s Office of Public Participation in facilitating public engagement. By offering guidance and support, particularly for those less familiar with regulatory processes, it projects a positive step toward inclusivity.
Business Stakeholders: For businesses involved in energy supply and distribution, these filings are fundamental to strategic planning, as they influence contract terms and operational costs.
Environmental and Community Groups: Responses to rate changes or pipeline acquisitions impact environmental and community advocacy efforts, given the potential economic and ecological implications of infrastructure developments.
In conclusion, while the document is crucial for transparency and regulatory compliance, its complexity and presumptions regarding accessibility may limit effective public engagement. Simplifying language and improving guidance could enhance understanding and participation, thereby better aligning regulatory intentions with stakeholder needs.
Issues
• The document lacks an abstract, which could provide a concise summary of the notice for easier understanding.
• The language used in the document, especially the section concerning rules and regulations (e.g., 'protest, or to answer a complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations'), may be complex for the general public to understand without prior knowledge of FERC procedures.
• The notice uses numerous docket numbers and technical references without explanation, which might be unclear to stakeholders not familiar with FERC's processes.
• The document provides links to additional resources and filing requirements, assuming user familiarity with online tools and electronic filing processes, which might be challenging for those without internet access or digital literacy.
• Potential readers who are not familiar with the eLibrary system or the filing requirements may find this document difficult to navigate without additional guidance or simplified instructions.