FR 2024-31554

The document titled "Federal Secure Cloud Advisory Committee Request for Applications" from the General Services Administration (GSA) announces an opportunity for individuals to apply for three membership seats on the Federal Secure Cloud Advisory Committee (FSCAC). This committee plays a critical role in advising on secure cloud computing practices for federal agencies, ensuring they remain secure and efficient.

General Summary

The GSA intends to appoint individuals to fill open positions on the Federal Secure Cloud Advisory Committee. This committee's primary function is to provide advice on various aspects of cloud security usage across federal agencies. There are two steps to the application process: completing an online form and emailing additional documents, including a required endorsement letter from an organization's leadership.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues emerge from the document. First, compensation and funding for travel and per diem expenses are vaguely mentioned, which could deter potential applicants concerned about financial implications. Normally, such positions indicate whether they are voluntary or compensated, but this document does not provide explicit details.

Another concern is the submission requirements for the letter of endorsement. Specifically, for CEOs, it states the endorsement must come from another executive team member. There is ambiguity regarding what qualifies as an 'executive team member,' which may lead to confusion during the application process.

The document also lists restrictions on federally registered lobbyists serving in individual capacities. However, the explanation of these restrictions is complex and might confuse prospective applicants who should understand these limitations clearly.

Furthermore, the terminology used to describe "unique businesses" that provide cloud services could benefit from further clarification, aiding businesses in determining their eligibility.

Lastly, while letters of recommendation can be submitted along with applications, the document remains unclear about their influence on the decision-making process. Stating they "may or may not have an impact" introduces uncertainty for applicants deciding whether or not to include them.

Public and Stakeholder Impact

Broadly, the solicitation of applications for the FSCAC emphasizes the government's ongoing efforts to ensure federal cloud computing services are both robust and secure. As federal agencies increasingly rely on cloud services, this advisory committee will play a pivotal role in shaping policies that affect how government offices nationwide utilize these technologies.

Specific stakeholders, such as tech companies specializing in cloud services, may see this as an opportunity to influence federal cloud policy by obtaining membership on the committee. However, small business entities and independent assessors may feel overshadowed by larger organizations, especially if the definition of "unique businesses" remains ambiguous.

For government employees, particularly those in Chief Information Security Officer positions, this presents an opportunity to guide governmental cloud computing pathways. However, without clearly addressed compensation and travel funding, potential candidates may be hesitant to engage.

Conclusion

While the document opens avenues for skilled individuals to contribute to critical federal cloud computing discussions, it contains several ambiguities and omissions that might deter potential applicants. Clarifying these aspects could enhance the appeal and accessibility of these advisory roles, ensuring the committee reflects diverse expertise and perspectives.