FR 2024-31495

Overview

Title

National Transit Database Reporting Changes and Clarifications for Report Years 2025 and 2026

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Federal Transit Administration wants more time for people to share their thoughts about some new rules on how buses and trains report safety stuff. People can tell the FTA what they think by sending letters or going online until the end of January 2025.

Summary AI

The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is reopening the comment period for changes and clarifications to the National Transit Database reporting requirements, originally announced on October 31, 2024. This extension allows more time for transit agencies and affected parties to review and comment on these changes, which impact safety and security reporting. Comments can be submitted by January 29, 2025, through various methods, including online, mail, or fax. The goal is to gather additional input due to the complex nature of the proposals and the holiday period overlapping with the original comment timeframe.

Abstract

The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is reopening the comment period for the Federal Register notice regarding FTA's National Transit Database reporting changes and clarifications, which was published on October 31, 2024, with the original comment period closing on December 30, 2024.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 384
Document #: 2024-31495
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 384-385

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Document

The document under analysis is a notice from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), part of the U.S. Department of Transportation, regarding changes and clarifications to the National Transit Database (NTD) reporting requirements. The FTA has reopened the comment period on these changes, which were initially published on October 31, 2024. The extension of the comment period until January 29, 2025, provides an opportunity for further input, primarily due to the complexity of the proposed changes and their overlap with the holiday season. The changes focus on areas impacting safety and security reporting and aim to give all impacted parties, such as transit agencies, sufficient time to review and respond.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A notable issue with the document is the absence of information regarding potential costs or funding associated with the proposed changes. This lack of financial context makes it challenging to assess whether the adjustments might lead to wasteful spending. Additionally, the document does not specify any organizations or individuals who might be particularly favored by the changes, thereby making it difficult to identify possible biases.

The process outlined for submitting comments is detailed, although it may be overly complex for individuals unfamiliar with federal submission processes. This complexity could discourage participation from stakeholders who might otherwise contribute valuable insights. Furthermore, the document references a previous Federal Register notice by its citation number without summarizing its content. This reference might limit understanding for readers who are not familiar with the original notice.

Broad Public Impact

The reopening of the comment period has the potential to affect the public broadly by ensuring that the National Transit Database accurately reflects the needs and concerns of all stakeholders. By allowing more time for comments, the FTA is offering transit agencies and interested parties an opportunity to influence how transit data is collected and reported, potentially leading to enhancements in transit system safety and security.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For transit agencies, the extended comment period is vital as it provides additional time to thoroughly assess the impact of the proposed reporting changes on their operations. The modifications could necessitate updates to data collection processes or reporting systems, which could have financial and operational implications. Similarly, other stakeholders involved in public transit safety and security may find the period beneficial as it allows them to provide input on enhancements that might affect their workflows or initiatives.

In summary, while the document outlines a procedural extension aimed at gathering more comprehensive input on proposed reporting changes, it leaves some significant questions unanswered concerning financial implications and potential biases. However, the extension itself is a positive step toward ensuring that the final regulations are finely tuned to the real-world needs of transit stakeholders, ultimately benefiting all involved parties.

Issues

  • • The document does not include any specific information regarding costs or funding related to the National Transit Database reporting changes, which makes it unclear if there is potential for wasteful spending.

  • • There is no information provided about any particular organizations or individuals who might be favored by the proposed changes, making it difficult to assess potential biases.

  • • The language used to describe the process for submitting comments is detailed, but may be considered overly complex for laypersons unfamiliar with federal document submission procedures.

  • • The document references another Federal Register notice by its citation (89 FR 86907) without a summary of that notice's content, which may limit understanding for readers unfamiliar with the past document.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 798
Sentences: 28
Entities: 69

Language

Nouns: 285
Verbs: 55
Adjectives: 20
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 53

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.33
Average Sentence Length:
28.50
Token Entropy:
5.19
Readability (ARI):
21.32

Reading Time

about 3 minutes