FR 2024-31440

Overview

Title

Combined Notice of Filings #1

Agencies

ELI5 AI

In this document, different energy companies told the government about changes they want to make with electricity prices and rules, like asking for permission. People can read these requests online and tell the government if they disagree, but they have to follow special instructions and meet deadlines.

Summary AI

The document is a notice of various filings received by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) related to accounting requests, corporate electric transactions, and rate filings as of December 23, 2024. It lists submissions from several companies such as Madison Gas & Electric Company, Shiloh IV Lessee, LLC, and Duke Energy, among others, with details like docket numbers, filing dates, and comment deadlines. Individuals interested in intervening or protesting these proceedings must adhere to specific guidelines and deadlines. The filings can be accessed through FERC's eLibrary, and the Office of Public Participation is available to assist the public in engaging with these processes.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 107131
Document #: 2024-31440
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 107131-107133

AnalysisAI

The document is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), detailing various submissions related to accounting, corporate transactions, and electric rate filings. As of December 23, 2024, FERC has received numerous filings from a variety of companies, each accompanied by docket numbers, filing dates, and deadlines for public comments.

General Summary

The notice includes filings from companies such as Madison Gas & Electric Company, Shiloh IV Lessee, LLC, and Duke Energy, among others. These submissions are linked to processes surrounding accounting adjustments, corporate acquisitions, and compliance with federal power regulations. The document specifies how interested parties can access these filings through FERC's online library and provides instructions for those wishing to participate in the proceedings through interventions or protests.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues are inherent in this type of technical document. Primarily, the use of specialized terminology and acronyms (such as OATT, NITSA, and MBR) might hinder comprehension for those unfamiliar with the energy regulatory sector. The document lists numerous docket numbers and associated filings without explaining their implications, which may confound readers who lack the context or understanding of how these filings affect the energy landscape. Moreover, there is little information on the potential consequences these filings might have, leaving the reader unclear about their significance.

Broad Public Impact

The document outlines regulatory activities related to energy generation, distribution, and corporate processes that could indirectly impact energy pricing, availability, and infrastructure development. The outcomes of these filings might influence the cost of energy, which could eventually affect consumer energy bills. Furthermore, the procedures described could shape how energy companies operate, potentially affecting service reliability and innovation in energy technology.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders in the energy sector, such as energy companies, industrial consumers, and state regulators, this document plays a crucial role in legal and operational planning. Companies directly involved in these filings, like Duke Energy and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., could experience significant operational changes based on the outcomes of their requests. Regulatory shifts might offer opportunities or challenges, influencing strategic decisions.

For local communities and environmental advocates, regulatory outcomes might have a direct bearing on regional environmental policies and land use. The document provides avenues for public participation, suggesting an implicit acknowledgment of the need to involve diverse community voices in these regulatory processes.

Overall, the public and specific stakeholders rely on transparent regulatory practices to ensure fair energy policies and practices. The outcomes of such filings could help advance energy infrastructure and policy to better serve economic, environmental, and societal goals. However, the complexity and technical nature of the document require concerted efforts to demystify these processes for broader public engagement and understanding.

Issues

  • • The document uses specialized terminology and acronyms (e.g., IPC, OATT, NITSA, MBR) that may not be easily understood by the general public without explanation.

  • • The document lists a large number of docket numbers and associated filings, which could confuse readers not familiar with the filing process or context.

  • • The document does not provide specific details about the implications or impacts of the filings listed, which could leave readers uninformed about the outcomes.

  • • The document mentions several companies and applicants involved in filings, but it does not provide context or background on these entities, which could be helpful for understanding any potential bias or favoritism.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 2,607
Sentences: 174
Entities: 328

Language

Nouns: 966
Verbs: 80
Adjectives: 46
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 279

Complexity

Average Token Length:
6.29
Average Sentence Length:
14.98
Token Entropy:
4.62
Readability (ARI):
18.21

Reading Time

about 9 minutes