FR 2024-31304

Overview

Title

Notice of Intended Repatriation: The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The University of Kansas is giving back a special silver ring to the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes because it used to belong to an Arapaho person a long time ago. They're planning to make sure everything is fair, and they might give it back after January 29, 2025.

Summary AI

The University of Kansas plans to return a cultural item—a silver ring—that is considered an unassociated funerary object according to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The ring, linked to the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma, was taken from an Arapaho man named Wox-Ei-Bet' and has been part of a museum collection that is now managed by the University of Kansas. The repatriation process involves consulting with relevant Native American tribes, and competing claims may be considered before the item is returned. The formal repatriation could occur on or after January 29, 2025.

Abstract

In accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), the University of Kansas intends to repatriate a certain cultural item that meets the definition of an unassociated funerary object and that has a cultural affiliation with the Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations in this notice.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 106565
Document #: 2024-31304
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 106565-106566

AnalysisAI

The document describes a notice from the National Park Service, informing the public about the University of Kansas's intention to repatriate a silver ring under the provisions of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The ring, identified as an unassociated funerary object, is culturally affiliated with the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes in Oklahoma. The item has a historical connection to an Arapaho man named Wox-Ei-Bet', and it is intended to be returned to the tribes on or after January 29, 2025. This repatriation process involves consultation with the relevant Native American tribes.

Summary of the Notice

The core of this notice is the planned repatriation of a cultural item—a silver ring that originally belonged to an Arapaho man. The ring's journey to the University of Kansas, through various institutions, is outlined, and it is established as an artifact with historical and cultural significance to particular Native American tribes. The specific process by which repatriation is to occur is established under the NAGPRA guidelines, and affected tribes have been notified.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A notable concern is the lack of detail on how the cultural affiliation of the ring was established. This could create ambiguity around the decision-making process and affect the perceived legitimacy of the repatriation effort. Also, the document assumes that readers understand NAGPRA procedures, which might not be the case for everyone, potentially causing confusion around the resolution of competing claims for the ring's return.

The notice briefly mentions the absence of hazardous substances on the ring but does not elaborate on how this determination was made, potentially leaving questions about the thoroughness of such assessments. Additionally, the specifics concerning consultations with Native American tribes are not detailed, which could lead to questions about whether the process was inclusive and transparent.

The term "reasonable connection" used to describe the link between the ring and the tribes is vague, possibly leading to differing interpretations of what this constitutes.

Impact on the Public

For the broader public, this notice underscores the ongoing responsibilities of institutions like the University of Kansas to comply with federal mandates such as NAGPRA. It highlights the importance of acknowledging and respecting the cultural heritage of Native American tribes, facilitating a better understanding of the historic injustices they have faced.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For Native American tribes, notices like these are critical as they seek to reclaim cultural items taken from their communities. The repatriation of such items can help restore cultural heritage and identity, particularly for the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes involved in this case. However, the lack of transparency and detail around consultations and determinations of cultural affiliation might hinder trust in the process.

Conversely, for institutions holding these items, such as the University of Kansas, there is a responsibility to ensure accurate and respectful compliance with NAGPRA. The notice presents an opportunity to demonstrate a commitment to righting historical wrongs, although any perceived inadequacies in handling these processes can lead to reputational risk.

Overall, while the notice is positive in its aim to return culturally significant items, it would benefit from increased transparency and clearer communication to effectively support the needs and rights of all stakeholders involved.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify how the determination of cultural affiliation was made, which might lead to ambiguity regarding the decision-making process.

  • • The notice assumes that individuals reading it will be familiar with the process for resolving competing claims for repatriation, which could be unclear to those not well-versed in NAGPRA procedures.

  • • The details regarding potential hazardous substances are mentioned briefly without providing insight on how that determination was made, possibly leading to concerns about thoroughness.

  • • There is limited information on the nature and extent of consultations conducted, which may raise questions about the transparency and inclusiveness of the process.

  • • The document lacks clarity on what constitutes a 'reasonable connection' between the cultural item and the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes, potentially leading to interpretation issues.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 907
Sentences: 32
Entities: 89

Language

Nouns: 298
Verbs: 62
Adjectives: 56
Adverbs: 12
Numbers: 34

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.88
Average Sentence Length:
28.34
Token Entropy:
5.11
Readability (ARI):
19.43

Reading Time

about 3 minutes