FR 2024-31282

Overview

Title

Notice of Inventory Completion: California State University, Sacramento, Sacramento, CA

Agencies

ELI5 AI

California State University, Sacramento found some special objects in its collection that belong to Native American tribes and is working to give them back. They are starting this process soon, but some objects went missing and they are figuring out how to deal with that.

Summary AI

The California State University, Sacramento has completed an inventory of associated funerary objects and identified a cultural link with certain Native American tribes, as part of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). Repatriation of these objects can begin on or after January 29, 2025, to tribes identified in the notice or to others who can prove a cultural connection. The objects in question were initially collected in the 1950s and given to the university, though some objects are currently missing. The notice is issued by the National Park Service but the determinations and responsibility rest with the university.

Abstract

In accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), the California State University, Sacramento has completed an inventory of associated funerary objects and has determined that there is a cultural affiliation between the associated funerary objects and Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations in this notice.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 106564
Document #: 2024-31282
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 106564-106565

AnalysisAI

In December 2024, a significant notice was released by the National Park Service in coordination with the California State University, Sacramento, detailing the repatriation process of certain funerary objects under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). This notice outlines the university's completion of an inventory of these objects, which have been determined to have cultural affiliations with specific Native American tribes.

General Summary

The document announces that California State University, Sacramento, has concluded an inventory of funerary objects originating from a site in Placer County, California. These objects, linked with several Native American tribes, were originally collected in the 1950s and entrusted to the university. The official notice permits these items to be returned to the tribes, beginning in late January 2025, provided that the involved tribes or other potential claimants demonstrate a cultural connection to these items.

Significant Issues or Concerns

Several notable issues arise from the document. Firstly, while it acknowledges the presence of missing objects from the collection, it offers no detailed explanation of efforts made to recover them. This absence of information may lead to concerns regarding the completeness and integrity of the university's inventory. Additionally, the document refers to other potentially available documentation and consultations but fails to provide guidelines on how interested parties might access this information, potentially raising questions about transparency.

Furthermore, the contact information provided for inquiries is limited to a single individual, which might create bottlenecks or limit accessibility for those seeking further information or wishing to submit repatriation requests. Lastly, the language used in the document to describe the connection between the objects and the tribes appears imprecise, lacking specifics that could substantiate the cultural affiliations it mentions.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this document highlights ongoing efforts to address historical injustices regarding Native American cultural heritage and burial objects. It reinforces the importance of compliance with the NAGPRA law and underscores the commitment, at least in principle, to respecting Native American tribes' rights over culturally significant artifacts. However, the lack of detailed explanations about the efforts to identify missing items or access further documentation could undermine public confidence in the university's and authority's rigor in addressing such sensitive issues.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For Native American tribes and organizations identified in the notice, as well as others who may seek to establish a claim, this document represents both an opportunity and a challenge. It provides a pathway to reclaim important cultural and ceremonial items, which could have deep spiritual and historical significance. However, the absence of specificity and detailed guidance might make these processes more challenging or frustrating.

The document's approach also stresses the critical role institutions play in stewarding cultural assets and ensuring their rightful return, highlighting ongoing responsibilities for educational institutions, museums, and governmental bodies. Stakeholders, such as historians, legal experts, and advocates for Native American rights, may find the lack of clarity in the documentation process a matter of concern, which could affect advocacy and transparency efforts related to cultural repatriation efforts.

Issues

  • • The document provides information about the repatriation of funerary objects but lacks detailed context about the provenance or specifics of the consultation process that could be helpful for transparency.

  • • There is a mention of missing objects, but there is no explanation or detail on efforts to locate them, which may be of concern regarding the completeness and integrity of the inventory.

  • • The document refers to supplementary information available in records or inventory but does not provide clear instructions on how to access or request these documents, which might be seen as a lack of transparency.

  • • Contact details are provided for Dr. Mark R. Wheeler, but there could be a need for additional contact points for public queries related to this notice, ranging from repatriation requests to further information inquiries.

  • • The language used in the document, such as 'connection between the associated funerary objects' and specific Indian Tribes, could be considered somewhat vague without further specificity regarding the nature of these connections.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 745
Sentences: 28
Entities: 78

Language

Nouns: 249
Verbs: 54
Adjectives: 39
Adverbs: 10
Numbers: 36

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.15
Average Sentence Length:
26.61
Token Entropy:
4.95
Readability (ARI):
19.73

Reading Time

about 2 minutes