FR 2024-31241

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request; Annual and Final Report Template

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The National Science Foundation wants to ask people what they think about a new way to gather information from scientists who work together around the world. They want to know if this new plan makes sense and if it will help them learn more things that could only be discovered by these international team-ups.

Summary AI

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is planning to introduce a new collection to gather information on grantee reporting requirements specific to its Accelerating Research through International Network-to-Network Collaboration (AccelNet) Program. This action is in line with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. NSF is inviting public comments on this proposal until February 28, 2025. The proposed modification focuses on creating a tailored report template that reflects the international networking aims of the AccelNet program, as opposed to the NSF's standard template which does not adequately address these aspects.

Abstract

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans to establish this collection. In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are providing an opportunity for public comment on this action. After obtaining and considering public comment, NSF will prepare the submission requesting Office of Management and Budget (OMB) clearance of this collection for no longer than 3 years.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 106609
Document #: 2024-31241
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 106609-106609

AnalysisAI

The document is a notice from the National Science Foundation (NSF) regarding plans to introduce a new collection to gather information on grantee reporting requirements, specifically for its Accelerating Research through International Network-to-Network Collaboration (AccelNet) Program. This initiative aligns with the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, inviting public comments until February 28, 2025. The primary goal is to tailor their reporting template to better reflect the international focus of the AccelNet program, which the existing NSF templates do not adequately address.

Summary of the Document

The NSF is seeking to modify its reporting requirements, intending to create a more specific template for the AccelNet program. This program funds international networks that collaborate to create research agendas advancing science in ways not achievable without international cooperation. The NSF aims to gather feedback from the public before finalizing the modified template and submitting it for clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a period not exceeding three years.

Significant Issues or Concerns

Several significant issues arise from this document. Firstly, the document lacks detailed information on how the success or outcomes of the AccelNet program will be evaluated, raising concerns about how effectively resources are being utilized. Secondly, the language describing the purpose of the collection could benefit from simplification. The phrase "research agenda that will advance science in a way not possible with a concerted international cooperative effort" may be complex for some.

Additionally, the criteria by which the OMB will grant clearance is not specified, potentially leading to uncertainty for those required to comply. Financial implications of implementing the new template are not addressed, leaving room for potential concerns about resource allocation. Although there is an estimate of an 8-hour burden per awardee, it is unclear how this estimate is verified or audited, which could result in inaccuracies. Finally, there’s no detailed plan on how public comments will be solicited or integrated, possibly limiting stakeholder engagement and transparency.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this document indicates a shift towards more focused and potentially more burdensome reporting requirements for awardees of the AccelNet program. This could impact researchers and institutions involved in international collaborations, who will need to adapt to new reporting requirements. The changes aim to better capture the unique outcomes of internationally-focused projects, which may improve the NSF’s ability to track and support these activities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For awardees under the AccelNet program, this change could mean an adaptation period to the new reporting template, potentially requiring additional administrative effort. For researchers, the requirement may enhance the documentation of international networking activities, potentially improving recognition and support for such efforts. Conversely, the additional administrative burden could strain resources, especially for smaller organizations or new awardees unfamiliar with the NSF's framework.

Overall, while the document represents progress towards more tailored reporting in line with the program’s objectives, there are practical and procedural details that stakeholders must consider to ensure a smooth transition and effective involvement in the consultative process.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide detailed information on how the NSF plans to evaluate the success or outcome of the AccelNet program, which could lead to concerns about effective use of resources.

  • • The language describing the purpose of the collection may be complex, particularly the section about 'research agenda that will advance science in a way not possible with a concerted international cooperative effort.' This could be simplified for broader understanding.

  • • The document does not specify the criteria that will be used by OMB to grant clearance for the collection, which may result in uncertainty about compliance requirements.

  • • The financial impact of the collection or administrative costs involved in implementing the report template is not addressed, potentially overlooking possible resource allocation issues.

  • • Although the document specifies the burden as 8 hours per award, it doesn't clarify if there are means to verify or audit this estimated time burden, possibly leading to inaccuracies.

  • • The general public outreach or mechanisms for garnering public comment are mentioned but not detailed, potentially limiting stakeholder engagement or transparency.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 561
Sentences: 24
Entities: 48

Language

Nouns: 196
Verbs: 37
Adjectives: 27
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 36

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.23
Average Sentence Length:
23.38
Token Entropy:
5.14
Readability (ARI):
18.20

Reading Time

about 2 minutes