FR 2024-31232

Overview

Title

North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The North Pacific Fish Group is having a meeting where grown-ups can talk about different fish topics. You can join the meeting in person in Alaska or watch it online through a computer.

Summary AI

The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's Crab Plan Team will hold a hybrid public meeting from January 14 to January 15, 2025. Attendees can join in person at the Council's office in Anchorage, Alaska, or online. The meeting agenda includes discussing tools for model-based indices of survey data, updates to GMACS coding, stock assessment models, and other business. Additional details and a link for online participation are available on the Council's website.

Abstract

The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) Crab Plan Team will meet January 14, 2025 to January 15, 2025.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 106440
Document #: 2024-31232
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 106440-106440

AnalysisAI

The document is a notice from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) about an upcoming public meeting hosted by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council's Crab Plan Team. Scheduled for January 14 and 15, 2025, this meeting will take place in a hybrid format, allowing participants to join either in person at the Council's office in Anchorage, Alaska, or virtually. The focus of the meeting will be on several technical topics, including advancements in tools for creating model-based indices of survey data, updates to GMACS coding, and stock assessment models. Additionally, the agenda includes other business matters that may arise.

General Summary

The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's notice outlines the logistics of a public meeting geared toward those interested or involved in fisheries management, particularly regarding crab fisheries. The hybrid format offers accessibility to a broader audience, making it inclusive for stakeholders who might not be able to travel to Anchorage. The agenda is set to cover technical topics crucial for fisheries management, indicative of ongoing efforts to enhance sustainable fishing practices in the North Pacific region.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The document leaves several aspects unclarified. For instance, while it mentions specific topics such as "GMACS coding updates" and "stock assessment model developments," it does not explain what these terms mean. This could present a barrier to understanding for the general public, who might not be familiar with the technical jargon used in fisheries management. Furthermore, the notice contains acronyms like NMFS and NOAA without initial explanations, which could challenge readers unfamiliar with these organizations.

Additionally, the legal citation "16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq." is provided without explanation, potentially confusing those who are not versed in legal codes. Given that these meetings are open to the public, clear communication is crucial to ensure the broader community can fully engage with the content.

Public Impact

For the public, particularly those in the fishing industry or those concerned with environmental and marine conservation, this meeting offers a platform to understand and influence the management strategies employed by the Council. The hybrid nature of the meeting significantly lowers barriers to participation, allowing diverse input and engagement from a wide audience.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved in the North Pacific crab fisheries, this meeting is a crucial event. It presents an opportunity to gain insights into the Council's strategic direction and how it might affect their operations. The discussions on model-based indices and stock assessment models could directly inform future fishing quotas and regulations, impacting how businesses in the industry operate.

In summary, while the notice points to a well-intentioned effort to involve the public in fisheries management, it falls short in providing clear explanations of technical jargon and legal references. Enhancing clarity and accessibility of information would ensure more effective public engagement and a better understanding of the Council's work and its implications for both the environment and the economy.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific budgetary details, hence it is not possible to assess whether there is any wasteful spending.

  • • There is no indication of spending that favors particular organizations or individuals within the document.

  • • The language regarding the meeting agenda could be clarified by providing more explanation on what 'GMACS coding updates' and 'stock assessment model developments' entail for the average reader.

  • • The document uses acronyms (e.g., NMFS, NOAA, AK) without initially spelling them out, which could be unclear for readers unfamiliar with these terms.

  • • The document references '16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.' without explaining what this legal citation refers to, which might be confusing to those unfamiliar with legal codes.

  • • The meeting connection details are spread over multiple sections, which might make it difficult for readers to easily find all necessary information in one place.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 449
Sentences: 20
Entities: 43

Language

Nouns: 160
Verbs: 19
Adjectives: 12
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 37

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.23
Average Sentence Length:
22.45
Token Entropy:
4.74
Readability (ARI):
17.25

Reading Time

about a minute or two